By: Tim Azizkhan
Walt Disney once said that the “way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing.” It seems the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was listening. The FTC finally quit talking about banning non-competes and began doing it on April 23, 2024.
The much-anticipated final rule issued by the FTC would lift employment restrictions from millions of Americans, and according to the FTC’s projections, would increase new business formation, raise wages, lower health care costs, and spur a rise in patents. Yet what does the final rule actually say? Is the final rule even legally enforceable? What should business owners do? This blog will break down the FTC’s final rule and answer all these questions. Let’s jump right in!
What is a Non-compete?
A “non-compete” is a contractual agreement that restricts a worker’s ability to compete against an employer during or after current employment. Employers can enter into non-competes with employees, independent contractors, interns, volunteers, and more. These agreements prohibit workers from seeking employment with competitors or from starting their own competing businesses. However, these restrictions are often limited by duration, industry, geography, and scope. Supporters tout non-competes as tools that protect an employer’s trade secrets, confidential information, client lists, and internal talent. Opponents decry non-competes as unfair burdens to workers, impediments to wage growth, and threats to competition.
The FTC’s official definition of a non-compete can be found in its final rule.
Summary of the FTC’s Final Rule
The FTC recently issued a final rule declaring the use of non-compete clauses as an unfair method of competition. The rule establishes a nationwide ban on the use of non-compete agreements with most of the American workforce. The new regulation would be effective 120 days after its publication in the Federal Register.
Employers would no longer be permitted to enter into any new non-compete agreements with workers. The rule does not apply to non-competes entered into by a person pursuant to a bona fide sale of a business entity. The ban would also make the vast majority of existing non-competes unenforceable. Only existing agreements between employers and senior executives would remain in effect. Senior executives are individuals in “policy-making” positions who make more than $151,164 annually.
The final rule will not apply where a cause of action related to a non-compete accrued prior to the effective date.
What Requirements Do Businesses Have Under the Final Rule?
The final rule requires employers to provide notice to affected workers that such agreements are now unenforceable. Notice must be provided before the final rule’s effective date and sent individually to each impacted worker. Acceptable communication methods include text message, email, or written correspondence. The FTC has provided businesses with model language (see page 556) that is approved as compliant under the final rule.
Will the Final Rule be Legally Challenged?
Several legal challenges to the final rule are expected before the rule’s effective date, with two legal challenges already being filed in court. Parties are seeking injunctive relief against the rule, which if granted, would prevent the FTC’s final rule from becoming effective and enforceable until litigation commences. Legal arguments are likely to center around two central themes: 1) the constitutionality of the final rule itself and 2) whether the FTC has the legal authority to issue such a rule. The opposition’s goal with legal challenge is to delay the effective date of the rule, limit the final rule’s scope, and/or to have the rule eliminated completely.
How Should Business Owner’s Prepare for Possible Change?
Monitor the News
The first thing that business owners should do is closely monitor the news for further developments, especially court rulings. The current form of the rule could be upheld, limited in scope, readapted, or struck down completely. Business owners should pay close attention to how any of these potential outcomes might change business compliance requirements. Legal counsel can also assist businesses is achieving compliance under the final rule.
Be Aware of State Laws
Business owners must still consider the implications of state law on their businesses. The FTC’s final rule only preempts (overrules) state laws that conflict with the rule itself. State law may still prohibit activities allowed under the final rule. For example, non-solicitation agreements are permitted under the FTC’s final rule but would still be prohibited by California law.
Become Familiar with Alternatives to Non-competes
Business owners should begin familiarizing themselves with alternative tools and strategies that can be used in place of non-competes. There are many alternatives that businesses can adopt to achieve similar objectives. A few are listed below:
Non-disclosure Agreements and Trade Secret Laws
Businesses worried about protecting confidential information can enter into non-disclosure agreements or may be protected by trade secret laws. Non-disclosure agreements create a confidential relationship that would prohibit disclosure of sensitive information by parties to the agreement. Trade secret laws create civil and criminal penalties for the “misappropriation” of trade secrets.
Non-solicitation Agreements
Businesses worried about preventing their customers, clients, or employees from being poached by former employees can enter into non-solicitation agreements. These agreements prevent a current employee from soliciting the above-mentioned parties after leaving the company.
Improving Wages, Working Conditions, and Employee Benefits
Businesses worried about retaining talent should consider improving wages, working conditions, and employee benefits offerings. Employees stay at companies when they feel valued, and offering competitive and fair compensation is a great measure of that value. It costs employers an average of 33% of a worker’s annual salary to replace them, so employers may get a two for one here as they will save money and retain talent.
Conclusion
The story of the FTC’s final rule didn’t end on April 23, 2024. In fact, it was just the beginning of what has already proven to be a complicated and hotly contested issue. Significant legal challenges make the future of the FTC’s final rule hard to predict, but one thing is for certain: We are in for a wild ride!
This post has been reproduced and updated with the author’s permission. It was originally authored on May 6, 2024 and can be found here.
Tim Azizkhan, at the time of this post, is a second-year J.D./M.B.A. candidate at Penn State Dickinson Law. He is from Mechanicsburg, PA and is a proud graduate of Gettysburg College. Tim is a research assistant and the treasurer of the Business Law Society. He aspires to open his own business. Tim can be reached at the following email: tazizkhan@psu.edu
Sources:
NELP: FAQ on Non-compete Agreements
Economic Policy Institute: Non-compete Agreements
NOLO: Understanding Non-solicitation Agreements
Sayfarth: FTC Non-Compete Ban: What You Need to Know
ApolloTechnical: 19 Employee Retention Statistics That Will Surprise You
Indeed: Employee Retention: Strategies to Keep Employees
BrainyQuote: Walt Disney Quotes
Wikimedia Commons: Cancel Image