Tag Archives: naturalistic observation

“Class I’m Being Observed Today…”

Naturalistic observation is the psychological concept of people changing their behavior when they know they are being watched. Many times, this type of observation will be used if lab research cannot be done. Psychologists go about this type of research by studying the behavior of a person, or animal, in their normal setting with absolutely no intervention. This is commonly considered of be one of the best forms of research due to its cost-effectiveness, use in validating an experiment, and overall ease.

 

One common form of naturalistic observation I have witness first hands from kindergarten through 12th grade is a superior’s examination of a teacher’s effectiveness. In most schools, members of the administration will sit in on classes from time-to-time in order to make sure the teachers are doing their job to their best ability. Normally, said ‘administrator’ will seat themself in the back row of the classroom, and silently scribble on their note pad for the duration of the class. They are there to evaluate the teacher, and their evaluation can eventually help decide whether the teacher will remain, or be terminated.

 

Interestingly enough, teachers have a tendency of changing the way they teach/act during classes where they know they are being evaluated. More times than not, a teacher who may goof off during class suddenly becomes very serious when they know their job could be on the line. Additionally, teachers who may have a ‘different’ style of teaching, or a way of teaching that is not fully supported by the administration, they will usually change their method to a more simplistic and rudimentary practice. This is the perfect example of naturalistic observation, as the administrators are observing teachers in their natural setting while they do what they do every day. Furthermore, this example perfectly demonstrates how subjects will change their demeanor/behavior when they know they are being observed.

Naturalistic Observations

As far as descriptive research goes, naturalistic observation should provide the truest results based on how that observation is conducted compared to the others such as laboratory observation, case studies, and surveying. Naturalistic observation has the huge advantage of gathering information from people in their natural settings; you are able to watch people’s real behavior for research.

Throughout high school I used to lifeguard at our city pool. In the beginning of each summer we would run some tests on the new swimmers who signed up for swim lessons.  Our goal was to separate the swimmers not by age but by ability. Since the population we observed was usually a group of younger kids ranging from 5-8 years old, we would observe how they swam with just the instructor there compared to swimming with the rest of the group with only the lifeguards watching.  One of the major disadvantages of naturalistic observation is that if people know they are being watched, they will change their behavior. So, by putting kids in the natural setting (the pool with the other kids in their age group with the lifeguard watching like normal) versus having the swimmer swim for the instructor (swim in front of someone they know is testing them for swim lessons), we were able to see their true abilities.

Our results consistently showed that without the pressure of the instructor watching them swim, they performed much better in a natural setting with their peers in front of the lifeguard as they normally would in the pool. If we would have solely went off the results of their swimming performance in front of the instructor, we wouldn’t have been able to split up the swimmers as much as we would have liked to based on ability. This goes to show that compared to laboratory observation, naturalistic observation provides the better result because it is based on someone’s normal behavior.