Monthly Archives: October 2014

Jonas Savimbi

Jonas_Savimbi

A major catalyst for the eventual independence of the country of Angola was Jonas Malheiro Savimbi (August 3, 1934 – February 22, 2002). Savimbi was a very proud and patriotic man, devoting his life to the rectification of his homeland, which had been compromised under Portuguese rule. Savimbi was an honored Angolan military and political leader, whose reverence mainly stemmed from his founding of the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA). UNITA was a guerrilla warfare group aimed at attacking Portuguese colonial rule. However, it was not the only group aimed at overcoming Portuguese colonialism. It was in competition with two other guerrilla groups: the Movimento Popular de Libertaccao de Angola (MPLA), the first founded group in 1956, and the Frente Nacional de Liberation of Angola (FNLA), which was founded second in 1957. UNITA was founded last in 1966.

The start of Savimbi’s career began with his inclusion within the MPLA’s youth division in the 1960s. The MPLA helped Savimbi to mold himself into an ideal activist, and he became a force to be reckoned with. Not only did he receive activist training, but Savimbi was also an experienced soldier. He received military training in China and became a successful guerilla fighter, who used these learned tactics in warfare and became infamous for them. Because of this training, Savimbi drew the attention of both Chinese and American policymakers.

Savimbi’s motives can be brought to question regarding whether he was truly aimed at the liberation of Angola, or if he was simply aimed at procuring an elevated status, or perhaps a more balanced delegation of power. Some of his actions could be called selfish because, even after succeeding in retrieving Angolan Independence, Savimbi continued to wage a war…now against, his former ally, and an organization which he had once been a part of, the MPLA. After Angola declared independence, MPLA assumed control of Angola. Its president became the president of the entirety of Angola and, doubly, Savimbi’s greatest enemy. It has since been found that Savimbi went so far as to sign a pact with Portuguese authorities to help him fight the MPLA. Savimbi’s feud with the MPLA, which lasted from 1974-2002, ended with his death at the hands of the MPLA, or Angolan government.

The making of Idi Amin’s Regime

Amin-2

“His Excellency, President for Life, Field Marshal Al Hadji Doctor Idi Amin Dada, VC, DSO, MC, Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas and Conqueror of the British Empire in Africa in General and Uganda in Particular.”

– Self title

In 1971, General Idi Amin elected himself as President after over throwing the first established government of the nation under Milton Obote, post independence. He ruled as Commander in Chief for 8 long years. During that period of time, Idi Amin went on a rampage, killing over 300,000 Ugandans.

Obote was a well respected Ugandan politician but didn’t meet the Western standard in regards to English-Ugandan relations. He desired his country to be as liberated as possible, after all, that was aim of the fight for independence.

Let’s back track a little…

Interestingly, Amin was inducted into Britain’s Colonial African Troops, “KAR” at a young age with no significant educational experience. This military organization in question was a multi-battalion regiment, carried on by the British during colonial times, extending over most of East Africa.

As he was ascending through the ranks, he became infamous for his brutality and torture. From ordinary soldier, Amin excelled to  an “effendi”, the highest position achievable for an African soldier within the British army.

Once President, Idi Amin terrorized the entire nation of Uganda as England turned a blind eye.

One question I cannot help but ask myself: is it by pure chance, that the English bred one of the most ferocious dictators in the History of Africa, immediately after their Independence, at such a crucial, vulnerable and premature time period?

Idi Amin1

In recently declassified documents from England’s Colonial era, many of their atrocities lead and influenced  globally, including Asia and East Africa, were revealed. 

According to Sky News, a very reputable English TV channel, they quoted these British documents stating “Amin was reliable”.

Eleven days before the Coup against Obote’s government, Richard Slater, British High Commissioner in Kampala stated many issues the new regime caused the British, qualifying the Anglo-Ugandan relations as “deplorable”. What issues you may ask?

  • Obote’s new legislation gave all ownership of the import and export business to the Ugandan government.
  • 60% of the shares of oil companies, manufacturing industries, banks, insurance companies and others would be nationalized.

Normal right? Considering, Uganda was an INDEPENDANT country. But no, this was greatly challenging the British business interests in Uganda.

Moreover ‘there is a danger that other countries will be tempted to try and get away with similar measures with more damaging consequences for British investment and trade’. Three weeks after Uganda proceeded with all these new legislations, Sudan decided to nationalize foreign businesses in a “ even more unacceptable way”

African burden

Amin being a simple marionette, unconsciously  by his “allies”, he plummeted the country’s economy, racked up over 200 million dollars in debt, raised inflation to 20%, destroyed families, established poverty and unemployment but moreover mentally emotionally and physically scared an entire nation.

According to the British High commissioner , Ambassador Harold Smedley, Amin was ‘corrupt and unintelligent’ fully aware of his savagery but yet “despite his limitations Amin has considerable dignity and more the air of a leader than Obote.”

We’ve all seen Amin’s cruelty in class, dismembering his own spouse, using government officials heads as trophies. Now, is that the new definition of “dignity”?

Coming from a family of Ambassadors myself, the thought alone of someone of such stature conveying these thoughts is very frightening because this mindset itself can go a long way. And as we’ve learned, it did. It was only during the last few years when Idi Amin’s craziness made him turn against the English that they in return decided to stop any funding and ended relations with the country.

We need to open pour eyes and carefully inspect such situations in order for it to not repeat itself.  Nothing is really as it seems . A little food for thought.

” Nobody is as powerful as we make them out to be” – Alice Walker

http://www.biography.com/people/idi-amin-9183487

http://africanhistory.about.com/od/biography/a/bio_amin.htm

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/17/world/idi-amin-murderous-and-erratic-ruler-of-uganda-in-the-70-s-dies-in-exile.

html://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/36/502.html

Colonialism in Angola

Much of Angola’s colonial history was molded under the jurisdiction of the empire of Portugal. Especially after the Dutch occupation of the 1640s, the Portuguese stronghold in Angola was sturdier than ever. Their colonial rule during this period lasts for a period of almost three hundred years, reigning over Angola from 1655 until October 20, 1951, when Angola was designated an independent overseas province.

Portuguese interest in Angola initially sparked from its supposed expansion of Gold and other valuable materials. However, they soon found that Angola better served as a labor industry, and deemed slaves as the single-most valuable commodity in that area. Thus, slaves were exported from Angola, most of them destined for Brazil. However, the export of slaves did not last long as the Europeans were able to seize control of much of the Portuguese industry as part of the “scramble for Africa” taking place in the 1880s. Simultaneously, local African ethnic groups force Portuguese settlers into confined areas. As such, the Portuguese are at a disadvantage.

In the nineteenth century, the export of slaves was finally banned in Angola, leading to an end to their richest and most common export. However, the practice of slavery was not abandoned, and the country still attempted to utilize slaves within Angola’s bounds. This was eventually outlawed in 1875. Portuguese control still becomes stronger during this time, however, as the Portuguese are angered by their constant transformation from kingdom to republic.

In answer to a tightening of Portuguese control, in the 1950s and 60s, thee guerrilla groups from to fight of the Portuguese government and to achieve independence for Angola. They are: MPLA (Movimento Popular de Libertaccao de Angola), FNLA (Frente Nacional de Libertacao de Angola), and UNITA (Uniao Nacional para a Independencia Total de Angola). The government’s response to the situation is to send Portuguese peasants into Angola to act as slaves, rather than using the locals. As a result, forced labor is brought to an end, and provisions for education and health for native Africans in increased. In 1975, pressure from the guerilla groups forces Portuguese settlers out of Angola and Agostinho Neto, member of MPLA is deemed president of Angola, the rest of the MPLA being his government.

Nnamdi Azikiwe

76284-004-742F84F8

Throughout the history of Africa, as a whole, there have been many different leaders that control the vast countries. Some may have used their power to give themselves wealth and amenities but others did what was expected of them as leaders. In the early 1900s a conference took place in Berlin, Germany between many European countries. After the European countries practically segmented Africa after the Berlin conference many countries saw themselves under new rule. The majority countries had taken chunks out of Africa were France, England, Portugal, Germany, Belgium, Spain and Italy. My country, which is Nigeria was now overseen by Great Britain. The Queen of England was head of state for a short period of time in Nigeria in the 1960s but in 1963 the country experienced its ‘First Republic’. There was a constitution put into place, ‘the first constitution of the Republic of Nigeria’, where the countries first president would replace the ‘monarch’ or Queen Elizabeth. The first president of Nigeria’s name was Nnamdi Azikiwe who was appointed president in 1963, and he was a ‘man of the people’. Before his time as president Nnamdi was the 3rd Governor General of Nigeria with aid from Abubakar Tafawa Balewa as his prime minister. In 1960, Queen Elizabeth made him the ‘Privy Council of the United Kingdom’, which was a very prestigious achievement in the United Kingdom but not so much Nigeria. During 1960 he was also awarded the first president of the senate of Nigeria. His political party was called ‘National Council of Nigeria and Cameroons’ later changing to ‘Nigerian People’s Party’. Being the very first president of his country it is hard to keep things in balance, having almost no feel for what you now have to take head on. He was overthrown by military powers lead by Major Chukwuma Kaduna Nzeogwu and his Nigerian military juntas in 1966. This became a bit of a trend because as time went one history repeated it. Nigeria went from Republic to military rule back to Republic for numerous years actually a few decades. Currently the country is in their fourth republic and it seems to be holding its grounds rather well. Nnamdi led his country through a difficult time and made it a republic of its own. Although he was overthrown, the country has maintained a trend that seemingly has been working for them.

Power of The Pen

Although my country of research is Botswana, I cannot deny the huge overcast that Mighty South Africa has on little Botswana. Many revolutionary events that occurred in South Africa paved the way for freedom from colonization for many African nations located in or sounded by South Africa. That being said, it is only fair to choose a revolutionary activist from South Africa for my blog this week. One of the most important notes that I took from the presentation by Mr. Ronnie Burrage was that there are different approaches to activism. As we all know, the media is a very powerful tool to use to spread a message. An activist from South Africa who skillfully used the media to enlighten the people of South Africa was Percy Qoboza. Percy Qoboza, is revered as one of the most influential South African journalist. He was able to demonstrate the power of the pen through his “outspoken critique of the apartheid regime.” He used his writing as an outlet to bring awareness to oblivious white South Africans who had little knowledge of the brutality black South Africans faced during apartheid.percey

As I researched more about Percy Qoboza I found him to be very brave, strong willed, intellectual, and witty. He became a thorn in the side of the government, with his eloquent proclamations and stirring newspaper articles. He was quoted saying, ”If you sometimes get mad at me, because the sentiments I express keep you awake at night, then I am glad. I do not see why I should bear the brunt of insomnia worrying about what will happen tomorrow. If many of us can keep awake at night, then maybe we will do the sensible thing – talk together about our joint future.” This quote sums up Percy’s mission to wake up white South Africans who continually turned their eye away from the unfair circumstance that the black South Africans were dealing with. From this quote it is evident that Percy was not as radical as the government perceived him. He wanted to live in a country of equality where his people had the same advantages and opportunities as the foreign whites claiming their land.

percy2

Percy did not only write for whites but also for black South Africans who were settling for their current situations. Percy Qoboza admits to previously being an “Uncle Tom,” because of the way South Africa conditioned his mind. He did not realize this until he attended Harvard University in the United States. He states ”When I went down to Harvard Square for a meal I was tempted to look in the window of a place, to see if there were any blacks inside, before going in, The experience forced me to look at myself, and I was surprised to find that I was an Uncle Tom.” He was accustomed to being secluded from whites leading him to carry the fear of interacting with whites.

Percy Qoboza’s time at Harvard, exposed him to a less myopic point of view where apartheid was not a normal way of living. When he finally returned to South Africa he was a man with a new perspective on life and how society must truly be. He states, ”I found myself completely maladjusted, quite unable to accept the things that seemed quite normal before.” He understood that other black South Africans were not aware of the way things could be for them so he decided to do something about it. He became a vocal figure in South African newspapers, educating and enlightening both blacks, and whites while showcasing the power he had with his pen. Percy Qoboza’s drive to change his circumstance with journalism is exactly what Mr. Burrage spoke about. There are things that we as a generation must see and change. We are not conscious of what is truly going on in our society. We must step back and attain a different perceptive to truly grasp what is going on in our society so that we can make a change through our own outlet.

http://www.sahistory.org.za/people/percy-peter-qoboza

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/01/18/obituaries/percy-qoboza-50-a-black-journalist-from-south-africa.html

The American Ebola Scare

African Studies Blog #1

C. Odumegwu Ojukwu

Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu was the leader of Nigeria’s breakaway from the military dictatorship that divided Nigeria into 2 segregated sections that were dictated by religious differences. His actions are believed to have started the Nigerian War, which both helped to liberate the people of Nigeria and what started the perception of Africa as being a place of starvation, neglect, and war.

Ojukwu was born on November 4th, 1933 in Northern Nigeria as the son of one of the richest men in Nigeria, Sir Louis Odumegwu Ojukwu. He was a very well educated man, traveling to the UK to earn a Masters Degree in History at Oxford University. His involvement in the military started when he joined the Nigerian military aroun 1958. Considering his educated background, Ojukwu was promoted to Liutenant-Colonel. Out of the 250 officers, Ojukwu was one of only 15 Nigerians to join this rank.

During this time, Nigeria became independent from the United Kingdom. The newly independent country was divided by its’ different ethnic and religious inhabitants; the Hausa and Fulani in the north, Yoruba in the south-west, Ijaws in the south and Igbo in the south-east. In 1966, a group of Igbo rebels led a coup that resulted in the killing of 30 northern political leaders, including Nigeria’s Prime Minister. No political figures in the south were harmed. The north retaliated 8 months later, killing almost 30,000 Igbo. These events intensified the tension between the ethnic groups of Nigeria. After attempting to create a confederation of regions, federal and eastern governments failed to come up with a solution to help the rising conflicts between the ethnic parties. Finally the Eastern region, led by its military governor Ojukwu, announced that they were seceding from Nigeria to form the Republic of Biafra. Unfortunately, this area of Nigeria was a primary source of oil for the country as a whole which created difficulties.

On July of 1967, the federal government of the rest of Nigeria launched its first attack of “police measures” on the Republic of Biafra, which was well equipped to retaliate. Unfortunately, this fighting went on non-stop for 3 years, resulting in a large number of civilian deaths and famine. Images of The Republic of Biafra’s civilians travelled across the globe, creating the perpetuated stereotype that Africa as a whole is a place of genocide and starvation.

Critics of Ojukwu say that he is the reason Africa is still portrayed as a continent of suffering and starvation, which frustrates the millions of people who live there today. Others say that he was a revolutionary leader who emancipated the Igbo. Regardless of the opinion, he is a true revolutionary figure that stood up to take charge of a crumbling section of Nigeria.

Sources:
http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2101162,00.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biafra
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C._Odumegwu_Ojukwu

Paul Rusesabangina

Paul Rusesabagina is mostly known as the humanitarian Rwandan hotel manager who withheld and protected 1,268 Hutu and Tutsi refugees during the Rwandan Genocide. The Rwandan Genocide will go down in history as one of the bloodiest and deadliest times in Rwanda’s history, during which an estimated 500,000-1,000,000 Rwandans lives were taken. The origin of the war was a genocidal mass slaughter of the Tutsi and moderate Hutu by members of the Hutu majority. The genocide was so widespread that even top members of the national government were intimately involved, making it extremely difficult for members of society to escape the violence.

Interestingly enough, Rusesabagina was from both Hutu and Tusti descent. He was one of eight other siblings, and during his upbringing ethnic background did not pose as a threat. He was introduced to the concept and importance of protection at a young age when his family gave shelter to refugees during the late 1950’s and early 1960’s when issues between the Hutu and Tutsi were heating up. As Rusesabagina grew, he decided to capitalize on his passion of helping others and becoming closer to god by attending a seminary to become a minister of the Seventh-Day Adventist Church.

His endeavor did not go as planned, for after much trial and error Rusesabagina changed his life paths and found himself employed as the general manager of the Diplomates Hotel- a small portion of a hotel chain owned by the Swiss-Belgian Sabena conglomerate. Rusesabagina’s leadership skills were noticed early on in his career as manager, for he made a point of engaging with guests instead of sitting behind a desk. Rusesabagina took pride in his job, and

Rusesabagina’s leadership skills were founded in his ability to relate and manipulate people. For example, taking on the task of sheltering refugees took a lot more effort than simply opening up the doors to his hotel. When military captains would come to retrieve Tutsi refugees, Rusesabagina bribe them with alcohol, money, and cigars in order to leave the hotel. Bribing the military as a colossal gamble, for he was putting his own well being in jeopardy with these acts. Without his social skills, many of the Tutsi refuges would have been easily taken.

Rusesabagina also demonstrated his leadership skills by going to extreme levels in order to protect his “guests.” An example of this is within his ability to go to the ends of the earth in order to provide by repeatedly smuggling food and water into the hotel. Later, when the water supply was taken away, Paul used the water from the hotel’s pool so they wouldn’t become too dehydrated.

Amadou Toumani Touré

Although Mali does not have a famous anti-colonial politician, there were many that influenced its political foundations. My person of interest was Amadou Toumani Toure of Mali during the political unstable era of 20th century. Before he became known as a famous politician, Touré studied to be a teacher and later joined the army in 1969, receiving military training in France. It was interesting to find out that he was once part of the National Guard of Mali for a short period of time.

He came into the political scene by advocating speech and legal skills he acquired from many school. Touré first came to international prominence on 1991, as the leader of a coup that toppled Traoré.  Touré’s coup was generally welcomed because of Traoré’s poor policies, which had led to popular unrest, often resulted in violent riots. It was after days of such rioting that the coup took place, and it seemed to many that Touré had acted in the name of the people and brought stability and democracy to the country.

His impact was very significant in bringing peace and stability to politics in Mali. In preparation for Mali’s 2002 presidential elections, Touré resigned from the armed forces in September 2001. He ran as an independent candidate in the first round of voting, held on April 28, and did well, receiving the most votes. He prevailed in the second round, held on May 12, with the support of more than 40 parties and received 65 percent of the total vote, although the election was marred by low voter turnout and allegations of fraud. Nonetheless, Touré was inaugurated on June 8, 2002. As a president without party affiliation, he did not have the automatic support of a party in the National Assembly, but he offered to work with any party or coalition of parties that could gain legislative control. To that end, in September 2002 the Presidential Bloc coalition was formed to work with Touré, and he enjoyed the support of a stable legislative majority for a few years.

He continued his popular legacy in the Mali political scene by running for the next election. Touré was reelected in 2007, again running as an independent candidate, although he had the backing of the Alliance for Democracy and Progress. Touré captured 71 percent of the vote in the first round of voting, held on April 29, thus avoiding the need for a runoff election. In legislative elections held a few months later, the ADP won the majority of seats, and Touré again was able to enjoy stable legislative period.

However, On March 21, 2012, a coup was launched by a faction of the military that was unhappy with the way the administration was handling rebel activity in northern Mali. As the mutinying soldiers announced the suspension of the constitution and closed the country’s borders, Touré’s actual whereabouts were unknown, but he was said to be in a safe location guarded by troops still loyal to him. A week later Touré confirmed that he was still in Mali.  Nevertheless Toure was extremely influential in building the foundations after the colonial era of Mali.

Anti Colonism Activity

Blog Assignment #5

Anti colonism activities

president_kiirThe Mahdist movement under the leadership of Mohamed Ahmed Almahadi had a significant role in mobilizing the national passion and feelings of the Sudanese people. There were also some tribal and national movements at that time, but they were very weak and the connection between the Sudanese people themselves was also weak which made these movements loose their strength and ability to have an effect.

But the National People Movement was strengthening and affected by events in Egypt that took place after the First World War and the 1919 revolution .So for the first time in the Sudan the secret movements activities appeared, calling for revolution and demanding independence, this issue had spread among the Sudanese people. A new cultured and educated class of people emerged while a large number of the Sudanese people were affected by the patriotic feeling and belief which dominated the concept of every one and which was initiated by the Egyptians working in the Sudan who were affected by the 1919 revolution.

Meanwhile Britain worked to deepen the concept of the (Sudan for the Sudanese). In 1921 a secret association was formed named the Sudanese Union .Its members were the Students of Gordon college (now the University of Khartoum) which was under the administration of the colonialism, Meanwhile the white Brigade movement was formed and it was established by Ali Abdullatif, This movement played a vital role in the 1924 revolution while the national movement had called for unity with Egypt .On its side Britain called on its supporters from the tribal leaders to confront this movement .

Due to the violence practiced by the British expedition against the revolutionists and the terrorist methods of suppressing them, the Sudanese resort to the secret activities against colonialism and patriotism grew among the cultured class and was affected by different motives. Meanwhile the Egyptian army withdrew from Sudan for the second time in December 1924 AD after the assassination of sir le Stack, the governor general of the Sudan in Egypt, which sparkled a great unrest in the Sudan. In February 1938 AD the graduate’s congress was established comprising a great number of members from the cultured and educated people .It started its activities by providing social services then transferred to the political work and called on for the independence of the Sudan. Meanwhile, following the return of the Egyptian army to the Sudan, Britain worked for the issue of separating the Sudan from Egypt from one side and the separation of northern Sudan from its South from another side. The 1936 agreement between Egypt and Britain had focused on the condominium agreement which was signed in 1899 AD and stipulated that the governance of Sudan should remain shared between the two countries though Egypt tried to cancel this agreement and realize unity between the Sudan and Egypt. Long negotiations took place and then Egypt presented the case to the security council in 1947 AD which abstained from taking any decision then the Egyptian government from its side in the 8th of October 1951 repealed the 1936 agreement. The Egyptian July 1952 revolution was preceded by an Egyptian / British negotiations on the Sudanese affair and when the revolution erupted in the 23rd of July 1952 the Sudanese affair was decided to be separated from the issue of the British withdrawal from the Sues Canal in any negotiations between the two countries.