Tag Archives: Algeria

FLN- Terrorists or Freedom Fighters

zohra drif

Zohra Drif

 

casbah

Modern Picture of Algiers Casbah

 

There were many small cells and groups who began to organize in the early 50s to try and force the French out, eventually they all came together to form one cohesive group.

After nearly a century of French control, Algerians were more than tired of the colonial presence. The socialist political party FLN (Front de Liberation Nationale in French) or the National Liberation Front was formed to try to offer the Muslim population of Algeria hope for future independence from the French who had killed thousands of innocents, and continued to occupy land which was not theirs.

In November of 1954 there was an armed rebellion by Muslim forces. There were some skirmishes between French troops and the FLN, but it failed to gain international attention.  The FLN wanted their voices to be heard, and wanted the world to take notice of their struggle. Media attention would gain traction for their trajectory toward freedom.

In 1956 the FLN decided to begin to direct their efforts towards the capital city of Algiers to gain international attention, and also to combat the thousands of troops being sent to Algeria by the French government in 1956.

By May, around 250,000 troops had been deployed and there were frequent raids in the Casbah of Algiers. The FLN didn’t want to negotiate, and by the next month the French Prime Minister Guy Mollet increased the military presence to 400,000.

The FLN began ordering random killings of French officials,  The french bombed the casbah back in retaliation. Many Muslim residents sought to get revenge and planned to move into the French Quarter in a mob and inflict violence. The French had caught wind of the idea, and it was sure going to be a bloody exchange if followed through.

Yacef Saadi, the military leader of the Algiers FLN, sent his lieutenants to tell the mob to turn around to minimize civilian deaths. The FLN swore they would avenge the people of the Casbah.

The FLN began bombing French police stations and administrative institutions, as well as popular hang outs of French civilians. An infamous incident of such was on September 30th of 1956. A young woman Zohra Drif planted a bomb in “Milk Bar Cafe” killing three and critically wounding many others.

Because there were curfews and blockades around the Casbah, they used Drif to plant the bomb, as she had a lighter complexion and could pass for French when the curfew was in affect.

In 1957 the FLN sought to argue on their behalf to the United Nations that they were a legitimate political party and not a terrorist group who had the support of the Algerian Muslim population.

They planned a strike among shop owners and workers, yet after only eight days the French broke them down with force.

The FLN carried on with random killings. Soon Jacques Massu was appointed as leader of the French forces. He was a fierce military leader, and after the blunder of the French’s war with Vietnam, they wanted to avoid such an outcome in Algeria.

Massu was not opposed to extreme tactics against his FLN enemies. He was able to justify such treatment, as there had been much violence and brutality to French women and children, and their attacks were often at times when the military personnel were unaware and unable to fight back.

They eventually captured Ben M’Hidi, the FLN’s leader, it was a big media gesture. He eventually died in prison. The formal explanation was that he killed himself in his cell, but it is more likely he was tortured to the point of death.

The French would win the Battle of Algiers, but would go on to lose the war. There were around 1,000,000 casualties over the course of the struggle. And while both sides were suffering heavy losses, the Algerians could sustain it theoretically, yet the French could no longer politically justify such a heavy loss of life for a war not concerning their domestic country.

Charles De Gaulle, leader of France, decided to pull out. So the FLN succeeded in driving the French out.

The interesting thing about the FLN, is that they used very controversial means to achieve their freedom. Bombings of public buildings with much loss of innocent life is hard for me to justify. I know their cause was an important one to them, but it is morally disgusting to me. Yet, the French killed many innocents as well, and over time committed genocide. So, I suppose the rebels were merely firing back in accordance with what the French had done and were doing. If viewed through a Machiavellian lens, the end justified the means. A downtrodden people who had been oppressed and recognized as less than people had gained back the territory that was naturally theirs.

Zohra Drif, whom I mentioned earlier, would serve later in the Algerian government. While she and her counterparts may have used terroristic and dirty methods, they had something they wanted to accomplish, and many among the Muslim population saw the FLN as heroes beating the oppressors out of their homeland.

 

Sources:

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/algeria.htm

 

http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Algerian_War.html

Background and thoughts Algeria’s colonization by France and colonization in the US

french algeria

What do Algeria, the United States, Canada, Haiti, South Africa, Brazil and almost any country you can think of have in common? All of these nations were at one point places of colonial rule by foreign powers. More specifically, Algeria and the United States were both controlled at one time by European countries. And in fact, both were colonized by the French at certain points, though, the United States would later be unanimously controlled by Great Britain.

As in colonization of any area, the country of power who comes in and encroaches upon a land in some way. Imperialism is no coincidence, and is a vicious, unfair vehicle for the controlling nation to extract some kind of resource tactical or material out of occupying a land.

In the case of Algeria, the French sought out to establish a tactical foothold, as well as a colony for entrepreneurs to exploit. Here in America, when the French were here, they established fur trading posts in Detroit and established a major port in New Orleans. In New England there was much timber trade by the British. And in the South Tobacco was a big cash crop for Great Britain.

In Both America and Algeria, the economies were propped up by the use of slavery. Although the difference here, is that the French enslaved the Algerians, while the British transplanted people from East Africa and brought them to an unfamiliar land. Both are gross travesties. And, even after their abolitions, created major dividing lines, between whites and native, darker skinned people. The outsiders, as in all imperialist situations, were seen as the people in the right, in charge, to be looked up to. After all, they inflicted violence upon the natives if they didn’t.

In the first half of the 1800s there were many pirate attacks on European shifts along the Mediterranean. Much of North Africa offered safe havens for these pirates.

The land which now constitutes Algeria was a part of the Ottoman Empire in the 1830s. The United States were also controlled by other countries before the English established the thirteen colonies, such as, the French, the Spanish and the Dutch.

In France, Napoleon had been out of power for some time, the Bourbon Restoration was going on. It was a time of conservatism and in general, the nation needed to prove it was strong again.

France’s ruler of the time, Charles X, used a petty disagreement between a French consul and an Ottoman leader, as a springboard to invade Algeria. And so they did. In what was supposed to be a civilized overtaking, women were raped, goods were stolen, people were arrested for arbitrary reasons, and people were killed for no good reason.

The French installed many of their own rulers. Over their occupation, the French changed power multiple times. For a brief period, Algeria was actually considered part of the nation of France. They moved in many citizens, some who were entrepreneurs looking to buy land, and some who were peasants and sought to live cheaper and start anew in Algeria.

Much like America, beyond perhaps a few figurehead local leaders, Algerians had no representation, and were being mistreated by French authorities. AND much like in America, as when the British controlled and when the United States won its independence, genocide occurred. Many Berbers in Algeria were killed in order to deal with insurrection or unwillingness to move out of land, much like the United States killed off many Indians.

Abd al Qadir emerged as a fighter of the people, and sought to create an independent Algerian state. He fought a Guerilla war, much like we fought in some of the mountains and valleys of New England, and the Indians fought against our forces.

He established a government in the areas not yet occupied by the French.  It provided military resources, collected taxes and had a focus on education. But in 1836, after a defeat to French forces, they allowed him to have territory they referred to as the Moslem State. Yet, three years later, they attacked and overtook territory that was supposed to belong to al Qadir’s state.

Fighting ensued back and forth until 1843. At this time the French had one third of its whole army stationed in Algeria.

Algeria would not gain independence from France until 1962. The United States can at least say that we’ve had a few centuries of independence. This enabled us to figure out what works and doesn’t work, it allowed us to fight for human rights for different minority groups (something that is still going on), and it enabled us time and infrastructure to take advantage of multiple periods of progress, development and modernization.

While Algeria is now independent, they still are not as stable as the United States. For a country to have only been independent for less than a hundred years, they have not had ample time to work out domestic issues and develop all of its potential socially and economically. They are still beholden to some foreign influence, and are considered a developing nation. Perhaps, had the French not been so ruthless in their control of Algeria, or never invaded, who knows how different things could have been.

Though it is important to note that there was never a nationalist move to make Algeria a nation of its own until French control. While the French killed many people and acted in no part in the interests of the Algerian people, in a way, their colonization, helped the Algerians come together and helped solidify their cultural identity.

sources:

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/algeria.htm

http://www.cairn.info/zen.php?ID_ARTICLE=CEA_195_0805

http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/essays/algeria-colonization-and-independence

CAF sends out warning after Cameroonian player killed

article-2733617-20C39FC000000578-582_634x425

In Algeria, last Thursday, August 28th, during a professional soccer (futbol) game a player was struck and killed by an object flung from the stands. His name is Albert Ebosse and he was the Algerian league’s top scorer last season notching 17 goals while playing for JS Kabylie based out of the Alergian city of Tizi Ouzou. Ebosse, who was 24, died from being hit in the head by piece of concrete thrown by his home crowd. Issa Hayatou who is the Cameroonian president of the Confederation of African Football (CAF) gave a statement, “My thoughts go out to the family and friends of this young man who enjoyed his job peacefully and went further to pursue his passion for football abroad.” CAF president, Issa Hayatou, issued other statements as well but highlighted that, “African football cannot be the breeding ground for hooliganism whatsoever.” Hayatou also said he expects heavy sanctions to be produced for the Algerian league along with an investigation from the Algeria’s interior ministry. In Africa and throughout the surrounding area, soccer is a very important aspect of the community. This year in soccer (futbol), the Algerian team made the FIFA World Cup in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
During this time in Algeria during the summer the people were ambitious and were united while watching the team. A few months later in the same country a tragedy like this occurs in a area that had been so enthusiastic over their national team. This is important because there are some places in the world that let soccer (futbol) affect the community in such a way as this. In Africa, there are many situations where populations are affected by violence or war. I feel that the events that happened on Tuesday were a direct result of the events going on in Northern Africa. It may be go to far to say that just from soccer you can tell how violent a country is but you can see a small portion. Currently Algeria is is facing a lot of trouble that is going on in the surrounding countries. Morocco, Mali, Libya and although not bordering Egypt all play a role on Algeria. Egypt and Libya recently have had a lot of violence and Algeria in fact just reopened their borders to Libya. Although soccer is a very different topic then War, but in ‘vulnerable’ countries some events as little as soccer can play a much bigger role.

Throughout the article there is an emphasis on sadness and tragedy, as there should be. Typically when CNN reports a story on Africa it is related to violence, war, disease, overall sadness or perhaps a tourist destination. In this case it is violence and sadness, the article doesn’t give as many details as it could but it does a good job delivering the information. Personally I feel the issue is unsolved and happens to often in the soccer (futbol) community. Soccer (futbol) is commonly associated with large, intense and crazy crowds where such a tragedy is possible. I hope the CAF and Issa Hayatou can find a way to prevent such a tragedy from happening again. This topic isn’t as ‘mainstream’ as one would think about current events in Africa but it shows a topic that is usually uninvolved with sadness of this magnitude perhaps highlighting how events can shape an area.

(Previously posted to the wrong page)