Author Archives: Michael Norton Wagenknecht

Extra Credit: Lucid Dreaming or…

Lucid dream (if it exists) as explained in class is the ability to control what goes in the dream because of awareness of being in a dream. I experience quite often about once a week something supposedly called sleep paralysis. That is apparently where you are wake but cannot move, make a sound or physically open the eyes. This is different from being awake and relaxed as described in class, as it is awake and panic.

The first few times, I was actually frightened and felt I would enter Limbo or something if I couldn’t break out of the sleep. This is different from being awake and relaxed as described in class, as it is awake and panic. After its steady occurrence, I learned that I was in full control of what was going on, and just try to sleep through it. I believe this would be in the deep sleep stages of REM, where it is difficult to wake up.

After sleeping through it I feel I am now in full control of my dream, and to be fair it is enjoyable,  and takes focus to remain in the dream. Many times I found myself not in full mental exertion and I would break out of the dream ever so slowly. With practice and experience during the sleep I became able to remain in control for a decently longer time.

I therefore do believe Lucid dreaming is a thing, since the control you get is phenomenal, from tasting to feeling to really vividly experiencing the dream like it is real life.

I find that the way to Lucid dream is to unfortunately sleep more than you need to. When I am dead tired, I pass out and wake up in a second it feels. When I sleep for long unnecessary and try to force myself to sleep more than needed I enter lucid dreaming. Like Freud suggested, I feel when we sleep excessively more often times it is a chance to escape from external problems, and therefore the dreams give us a chance for wish fulfillment to get past those problems.

Now for an example. My favourite and most recurring lucid dream seems to be playing in a soccer game always. it’s so real it’s amazing. It feels like a full 90 minute match, and I play with players who I either play with currently or watch professionally on the tele. I get to control my passes, shots, decision making, technique and work rate. It is literally just like a game. I believe this is lucid dreaming because I have had dreams playing in soccer games where I have had no control of how I played, and I am able to compare the two. However, what keeps me wondering if there are variations of lucid dreams is that I think it is real life, but I can control it. I am not aware that I am in a dream but I can control it still. It feels real.

Classical Conditioning by accident?

The outcome of classical conditioning can be taught, and is most likely always used to teach animals and people to produce behaviours. Like discussed in class, the pigeon that turns in circle to get its food is an example of classical conditioning.

When my dog was just a puppy, she seemed to have learned to produce a certain behaviour without us meaning for it. This all started because of the presentation of the unconditioned stimulus, her dog treat. Now, either she was smart, or we just shouldn’t have followed this dog training book:

My puppy always got into the newspaper and would chew it all up aggressively. The book instructed us to award the puppy with a treat whenever the puppy gets out of mischief as a form  of reward. Her unconditioned stimulus was that she would never get anxious and salivate for a treat when she would chew up newspaper. She learned to just get into the newspaper for the sake of her expecting the outcome of receiving a treat literally whenever she felt like it. Her salivating and expecting a treat by getting newspaper was her perhaps accidental or just smart conditioned response because of the conditioned stimulus of the newspaper. When she did not get her treat she would make it known! Do not train your dogs this way!

Describing Data and Wording Effects

The concept I will write about will be Describing Data based on Random Sampling and Random Assignment. A group from my high school was surveyed and from that specific group conclusions were made that I thought were misleading but at the time didn’t really think of it. Once we covered these parts of lecture in class, the survey rang a bell.

 

Describing data is done to find a measure of central tendency and/or to find the measure of variation.  Random sampling is when the surveyor randomly chooses the entire group of participants from a given population of potential participants. Random assignment however is the random delegation of the chosen participants to either control or experimental groups.

In research done by surveys, having data portrayed from the survey is one thing, however, it is imperative that there is a proper description of the data collected, to verify the reliability of the survey. For instance, a survey could indicate that 90% of students want co-ed gym rather than male separated by female gym classes. (By the way, this was the survey done at my high school by students) But what is that 90% coming from? Was every student asked the question? If not, were the students selected randomly selected?

The survey did not indicate any of this information. Then, the students went to the principal to protest a change in the gym classes. The principal asked for the proof, and the students said they gave each class a piece of paper indicating whether they support the protest or not.

The principal decided to do his own legitimate survey on the topic. This was indeed random sampling, however selective because he surveyed only the students at the school, and everyone at the school answered. The results ended up being that only 30% wanted co-ed gym.

The students who made the survey were then needed to confess how they actually surveyed and it was found out that they only surveyed close people, a total of 50.

That in turn is they’re wording of “90% of students” which is actually 45 of 50”, not representing close to the 1500 student body population.

From this survey I noted that the students really failed to describe the data, and that this misrepresentation led to false conclusions before the survey was properly taken with the random but correct and selective sampling.