It’s hard to look out into our big, vast sky and not ponder the question, “Are we alone?” Take into account the hundreds of bright little dots that you can see shinning in the average nighttime sky, and realize that what you are seeing is merely a fraction of what exists within our galaxy, let alone out entire universe. Scientists estimate that for every grain of sand on every single beach throughout the earth, there are at least 10,000 starts. That is a monumental figure, and I find it nearly impossible to wrap my mind around the sheer magnitude that encompasses and envelops our entire existence.
Scientists have taken it upon themselves to begin towards answering perhaps the biggest existential question that humanity has to offer at this current moment, “Are we alone? Is life common? Are we simply just rare? Where is everybody?” The latter question has developed itself into an entire paradox of its own, and is known as the Fermi Paradox. The Fermi Paradox holds that there is an inherent contradiction between the high estimates of probability concerning the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations, and the relative lack of any sort of tangible communication that we have had with any sort of purported alien life-forms. So, the question remains, how exactly do we conduct an experiment in order to help provide answers towards vindicating optimism in the face of this perplexing paradox?In this scenario, we are talking about the big game. As a result, any sort of experiment that we could possibly conduct in regards to fostering life in a hostile environment would take hundreds of millions of years. Instead of creating a species by scratch–which would most certainly be a heraculean feat of scientific ingenuity that we are probably not capable of in today’s current technological abilities–we should look towards the various extremophiles that exist throughout the earth. Organisms such as Endoliths may thrive on dry, rocky planets such as Mars. This first priority for any individual or organization interested in providing concrete predictions as to the ubiquity of life throughout the Universe rests first in venturing outside of our own world, with an open mind supplemented by useful inferences from our own. There are a plethora of various organisms that thrive in situations that many throughout the ages have deemed to be anathema to life itself, yet, life yet continues to flourish within these various areas.
Very intriguing topic, though I did get confused reading this. Are you saying that we should research extremophiles to see if they can exist on distant planets such as Mars? I liked the idea of creating our own species to see if it can live in hostile environments, though that would take a tremendous amount of time and technology to pull off. But even if we can conclude that some organisms that live on Earth could potentially live on other planets, how does that try to prove if there is life in other planets? If we were to implement our own species onto Mars, this still would not explain if there is life in Mars. I believe that we would have to find some form of organism in Mars to try to prove if there is life in Mars. I don’t think experiments should be used, we should explore and see for ourselves if life exists outside of Earth. It will definitely be hard and time consuming, but who knows what we will find? Anyways, take a look at my blog post about space exploration and its importance.http://sites.psu.edu/siowfa15/2015/09/15/should-we-invest-in-space-exploration/