Tag Archives: politics

With all this new technology, why are humans still so ignorant?

There are some times when I am just floored by how ignorant humans, specifically Americans, are these days, even when answers are right at their fingertips. America is the developed world’s second most ignorant country, in fact. First, I’d just like to compile a long list of ridiculous facts demonstrating the stupidity of some Americans.

  1. Only 71% of Americans can locate the Pacific Ocean on a map
  2. 22% of Americans could name all five Simpson family members, compared with just 1 in 1,000 people who could name all five First Amendment freedoms
  3. A 2007 National Constitutional Center poll found that two-thirds of Americans couldn’t name all three branches of the U.S. federal government, nor a single Supreme Court justice.
  4. When respondents of another poll were asked whether they could recall any of the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment, a majority could name only free speech. More than a third were unable to list any First Amendment rights.
  5. 14% of voters in one poll believe in Bigfoot
  6. 13% of voters think Barack Obama is the anti-Christ
  7. Polls over the last few years have variously shown that about 30 percent of us couldn’t name the vice president,
  8. about 35 percent couldn’t assign the proper century to the American Revolution
  9. 25% of Americans were unable to identify the country from which America gained its independence. Although 19% stated that they were unsure, Gallup findings indicated that others stated answers varying from France to China. Older folks scored much better than young people on this question, as a third of those 18-29 were unable to come up with the correct answer. [source]
  10. Despite being a constant fixture in school curricula, another 30% of Americans didn’t know what the Holocaust was. [source]
  11. 20% of americans believe that the Sun revolves around the Earth

I think you get the picture. The statistics are definitely crazy and slightly entertaining, while kind of disturbing. Please keep in mind that these statistics may not be current or taken from reliable sources. That being said, the general trend when googling “american ignorance” is that we are an overwhelmingly stupid population.

I know it’s fiction, but I think M.T Anderson’s novel Feed is a really great depiction of how the ability to easily acquire knowledge does not mean the human race will become any more knowledgeable. With Google, you can find the answer for any question you might have, but having the information served to you on a silver platter will make it harder to retain what you’ve learned. If you have to go digging to find something out, you have to WORK for that knowledge, and chances are you are going to come across something along the way that will stick with you.

This article supports my theory: “Why are we so deluded? The error can be traced to our mistaking unprecedented access to information with the actual consumption of it… only a small percentage of people take advantage of the great new resources at hand. In 2005, the Pew Research Center surveyed the news habits of some 3,000 Americans age 18 and older. The researchers found that 59% on a regular basis get at least some news from local TV, 47% from national TV news shows, and just 23% from the Internet.”

We are in a wash of news and information. Some is good, some is bad or anecdotal, and it can be hard to distinguish one kind from another. In addition, the previous link suggests that fewer people today read the paper, watch the news, or visit news websites. The voter turnout is declining, especially in young people, because a lack of information causes a sense of apathy and diminishes the importance of nationwide elections. It’s so easy to be informed in this day in age, but people take it for granted and don’t understand how much they truly do not understand about the world.

Is there such a thing as too much affirmative action in some college degree programs?

For a while, I’ve wondered if affirmative action in talent-based degrees such as theater, architecture, music performance, and fashion design is doing its job correctly.

My sister is a senior in high school and is applying to many major schools for musical theater. She attends the Academy of Theatre Arts, where many students do go on to pursue theater at a university. Last year, a graduating senior was accepted into the highly competitive NYU Tisch School of the Arts in New York City. He is a good dancer, but we were puzzling about why he was picked over the many other talented “triple threats” vying for a spot in the program. This student happened to be a mixed race hispanic, so it got me wondering if that had any effect in his being chosen above other students that might have been more talented.

Keep in mind- the above story is an anecdote. There are many things we do not know about the situation to judge how much this student’s race affected his acceptance. He could have had an excellent audition, known or worked with NYU faculty beforehand, received superb letters of recommendation… for all we know, the talent level in applicants last year may not have been as high.

However, I do want to examine in this blog post the pros and cons to affirmative action, and if it has truly succeeded in doing its job.


It’s a common myth that affirmative action will cause many Caucasian workers to lose out. Government statistics prove that this is not necessarily true. According to the Department of Commerce, “there are 2.6 million unemployed Black civilians and 114 million employed White civilians (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2011). Thus, even if every unemployed Black worker in the United States were to displace a White worker, only 2% of Whites would be affected.” This statement, however, is applicable to the general workforce and not the creative pursuits where talent comes into question. Statistics and studies in this specific area are severely lacking.

I do understand that many African Americans don’t have as much of an opportunity to learn how to play the violin well, study under a prestigious dance teacher, or visit cities with famous architecture to inspire them in their work. I think this is the problem that should be remedied- that way, we can even the playing field, and the main decision for college acceptances or job offers will be based on talent, like it should be. Surprisingly, one of my least favorite supreme court justices agrees with me. Clarence Thomas, “who has opposed affirmative action even while conceding that he benefited from it, told a reporter for The New York Times in 1982 that affirmative action placed students in programs above their abilities. Mr. Thomas, who was then the 34-year-old chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, didn’t deny the crisis in minority employment. But he blamed a failed education system rather than discrimination in admissions.”

There aren’t many studies to prove that it would be more beneficial to improve the early education system rather than have a quota for minority students applying for college. In some cases, I’m sure affirmative action works great- there are more minority and female workers in the workforce today than ever before. However, when talent is called into question, I wonder if there is a better solution to the inequality conundrum that still plagues us today.