One of the biggest political fights that has occurred over the past couple of years is the fight over the Keystone Oil Pipeline. The pipeline would have transported oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast, and quickly became a hot button political issue. Environmentalists feared what would happen if an oil spill were to occur and resented the fact that the process required to extract oil from Canadian tar sands emitted even more carbon dioxide. Eventually, President Obama would chose not to approve the pipeline causing Environmentalists to turn their attention to their next cause.
Recently activists in Utah were able to prevent the auctioning of government lands for oil drilling. Protesters are currently planning to meet in Washington D.C. in order to try and prevent another land auction, while Environmentalists are busy paying attention to the Paris Climate Talks.
So does preventing drilling improve the economy? There is evidence supporting the claim that some fossil fuels must remain undrilled if we are to prevent global temperatures from rising by more the two degrees Celsius. If temperatures begin to rise by more than two degrees Celsius Earth would face changing weather patterns, rising sea levels, and losses in food supply. While fossil fuel use needs to be limited, research shows that drilling does not need to stop immediately. A study published in Nature a couple of years ago found that “a third of remaining oil reserves, half of gas reserves and 80% of coal reserves should remain unused.” Despite this, it seems unlikely that the debate over drilling will end.
http://time.com/4102868/president-obama-rejects-keystone-xl-pipeline/#
http://time.com/4132636/activists-paris-climate-talks/