All posts by Suheng Li and Chin Hsu

Humanism Based Approach to Urbanization

Suheng Li, Chin Hsu

 

Periodical: Urban Omnibus

Characteristics: Urbanism, Urban Planning, and Humanism

Thesis: To achieve a foresighted approach of urbanization, we should value humanism as the most essential element rather than in negligence of people and culture.

 

Population growth and the acceleration of urbanization lead to increasing needs for new buildings. However, due to the unconsciousness of the importance of humanitarian architecture, and the lack of conservation policy, designers sometimes focusing more on profit instead of taking people’s needs as the most essential principle when they build. This action puts the cart before the horses because cities’ growth relies more on human activities rather than buildings. Therefore, the buildings should be celebrating humanism, which in this case, consists of the preservation of heritage, the fulfillment of people’s daily needs, and the improvement of life quality. Building in humanism way is a more natural and foresighted approach to urbanization.

 

Mentioning about humanitarian architecture, the first thing comes to one’s mind might be cultural heritages. They play an indispensable role in the city because they witness the history and the process of urbanization. However, old buildings may be obstacles for city development due to their antiquated styles and weaker functionality comparing to modern buildings. In recent years, China has demolished a large amount of old districts in order to develop new neighborhoods that better serve the cities. Such actions caused the loss of historic properties and conflicts between government and residents; people’s discontent has been fueled. A method that better considers people’s feelings is demanded. As a result, the government decided to reinvent old buildings and fit them into modern city.

 

Tian-Zi-Fang, a famous old neighborhood formed by “Nongtang” (a type of traditional alley in Shanghai), is one of the most famous projects. The site is located on Tai-kang St, Shanghai, where was once a marketplace. The roads were muddy and the stone facades have nothing in common with those glass or concrete ones. Due to the rapid development of surrounding area, concordance between old and new needs to be achieved (Zhang, 2011). Instead of simply rebuilding the whole area, a new neighborhood form called creative industry precinct was explored. The existing buildings were all kept. Factories were reinvented into design studios where young people gathered to realize their art dreams. The residents do not need to move out of the building. Instead, they rented the first floor and live on the second floor or above.  The first floor on which was passageway and courtyards became stylistic café and art galleries (Chen, 2010).  Thousands of visitors are attracted to the area every day to experience the combination of SOHO style and vintage Shanghai style. It produces the fund for maintaining the district and extra income for the residents. The roads were fixed as well during the reinvention making people’s lives more convenient. Such example shows us one way to minimize the bad influence on residents during the city development.

userid122202time20120228143433

credit to : Jssd . 

http://www.photofans.cn/album/showpic.php?year=2012&picid=169239

 

From the project of Tian-Zi-Fang, it’s not hard to realize that urbanization should be an action that is appreciated by people. However, nowadays, instead of considering serving people as the primary purpose, some developers regard people as a tool for making money. In some projects, the designer did not take in the consideration of the coordination between buildings and urban planning, nor did them provide enough facilities for the users. Therefore, people would not be living in such places because they don’t feel being served by the buildings, and the buildings are instead plain inconvenience in relation to the surroundings. That is why in a lot of Asian country, even though some of the cities has such high density of population, you can still find a lot of empty houses that no one lives in. For example, Taiwan, as such a tiny island with a large population, should have had a high occupancy on residences. Nevertheless, a great number of unused houses and apartments are appearing and even more building apartments are being built. These houses are called “ghost buildings”, they were bought only for estate speculation (Pingguo, 2015). Due to the fact that the developers and construction companies in Taiwan come up with the urban plan with the strong intention of making profits but not thinking deeply enough about people’s needs, the prices of the house has been increased in a incredibly high ratio in the past ten years, while the buildings are glutted (Su, 2014). Moreover, due to the developer’s’ preference of developing rural area or fully deconstruct the old buildings, the nature environment on the island was hurt. The constructions that are happening all around the city made people’s lives inconvenient. The whole atmosphere of urbanization is very “inhumane” and it is really necessary now to remind architects and city planners of their duty of thinking ahead about the urban planning. They are sometimes lost because of being affected too much by the clients. What developers want is a city with prosperous economy and modern skyscrapers, but what most residents want is a place where people could communicate and enjoy their lives easily. Therefore, a lot of Taiwanese architects started to set goals to save the future. In capital city of Taiwan, Taipei, there are more and more old districts appeared to be nearly abandoned, architects started to care more about the them by trying to redesign the structure based on its local culture. Instead of constructing new buildings, reinvention saves more money and time, and the architects are able to add more personal design aspects to the buildings. They realized that a highlighting on cultural elements well be more meaningful on such an island with strong national style. It gives people more feeling of home than skyscrapers. Design involves all sorts of aspects, but buildings based only on profits create concrete forest while architecture with regional characteristics give life to the city.

wn20130918n2a-870x580

credit to:hansioux

http://www.forumosa.com/taiwan/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=150458&start=20

As we’ve talked above, clients can affect an architect. At the same time, they may affect by their own misunderstanding on “humanism”.  Some architects decided to deliberately ignore the existing cultural and humanistic elements and establish the “utopian” of their minds. However, culture and humanity are the intelligence and experiences that people gained over time. One can hardly innovate merely by getting rid of them. One famous example is Noisy-le-Grand, a post-modernism architecture complex that locates in the east suburb of Paris. Spanish architect Ricardo Bofill designed the complex during World War II. With the concept of “utopian”, this “city” has the capacity for people from different social classes; it has 610 apartments and looks like a forest of concrete (Wikipedia, 2015). Bofill expected that his project would become a landmark and would work as the reference for other cities (Foster, 2015). However, he did not get his wish. Several failures happened in this project and two of the major ones are both about the negligence of humanity. First of all, the designer established the new city far away from the old one without providing enough facilities for daily life. Bofill focused only on the new form of neighborhood, but he did not pay enough attention to the needs of residents. Although the buildings are well built with innovative style, the supporting facilities such as traffic tools and commercial districts are inadequate. People who live in there still need to come back and forth between Noisy-le-Grand and Paris to fulfill their daily needs such as grocery shopping, entertaining and working. After all, the action of making the site away from the existing city became an encumbrance for residents. The city was not as independent as it supposed to be. The other pity is that the project failed to create an environment that leading people to communicate. Instead of having a sense of harmony in the neighborhood, the large density of apartments makes the space compressed and stressful; people are “trapped” in the fancy concrete boxes and can hardly have the mood for communication. Can’t stand with the inconvenience and the lifeless atmosphere of the “city”, most young residents moved out. Nowadays, only few elderly who feel rejected by the society still live in this deserted space. The similarity between these people and this neighborhood shows flashes of tragedy. As Bofill admitted in an interview after the failure: “Architecture does not change everything.”  (Foster, 2015). This example alerts architects that plans based on conjecture will not last long; people’s needs that exist objectively are the key elements that support the city to live and generate. Negligence of culture and humanity will only retard the development of the city.

Laurent_Kronental_-_ArchDaily_(3)

credit to: Laurent Kronental

http://www.archdaily.com/774578/a-utopian-dream-stood-still-ricardo-bofills-postmodern-parisian-housing-estate-of-noisy-le-grand

Celebrating humanism, which is, to be more specific, respecting people’s needs and habits, is the key for urbanization. To minimizing bad influence on people and environment, reinvention was used; it creates connection between the old and the new and enables the later generations to track down the development process of the city. Moreover, the full consideration about people’s feeling and their daily needs shows the respect to humanity, people will feel respected by the government and thus supporting the future urbanism. To sum up, people are always the primary purpose for a foresighted approach of urbanization.

 

Author, Xiaoyi Zhang. (06/05/2011). Tian- Zi- Fang. Baidu Wenku. Retrieved from:

http://wenku.baidu.com/link?url=jJ_6Dvl2KwTMjHJH0C5pG5138Lv_GirO1yNsUtD6ivQDZBvLZQqGnUUmc2M7g2O7BrC5RfTyN5iwBHG9TwKqVxycBf3BsRnAHVfbUuarMpy

 

Author, Yongming Chen. (05/01/2010). Tian-Zi-Fang: The Intersection of the Old and the New. Sina Blog. Retrieved from:

http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5f83e99e0100i7mn.html

 

Author, James Taylor- Foster. (10/01/2015). A Utopian Dream Stood Still: Ricardo Bofill’s Postmodern Parisian Housing Estate of Noisy-le-Grand. Arch Daily. Retrieved from:

http://www.archdaily.com/774578/a-utopian-dream-stood-still-ricardo-bofills-postmodern-parisian-housing-estate-of-noisy-le-grand

 

Author, Unknown. (06/26/2015). News: The vacant-house-ratio in Taiwan is rising sharply. Apprle Daily. Retrieved from:

http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20150626/636152/

 

Author, Yanling Su. (11/25/2014). News: The vacant-house-ratio in Taiwan is close to 20%. Housefun. Retrieved from:

http://news.housefun.com.tw/news/article/44167385079.html

Design Development Peer Review- Haley DeNardo

The idea behind Haley’s project is the fire station representing the society of Greenpoint, showing a strong symbol form as what the society were promised years ago. The proposal was to build green parks and improve the environment. Her site features an obvious separation between the inner side of the shore and the outer side of the shore. The inlet is surrounded by series of landscape design, and the landscape is divided into five parts by the elevated wooden walkway. Each part of the landscape could be seen as a sustainable strategy to the site. Furthermore, the program building organized in a V shape that surrounds the landscape, which creates this outside and inside tone that leads the visitors to define what is public and what is private.

Board and Presentation

Haley started off her presentation by introducing the history of the site, which I thought was a really good method. Because that is what her design was based off of. She introduces the past promises that government gave would help the society become better place but in fact nothing really been helped. Although the idea was really good, I do not really relate this idea to what I see from the project. The strong geometry of the building form takes away the focus of the design. I thought it would be better to go in a little bit deeper about the form of the building next time. I really appreciate the elevation and section drawings that you did, and I think that there was not a lot attention being caught by those drawings. It would be great if you could lead the judges into your drawings, such as you mentioned there is a pivot in your main building, then it would be great if you could point it out in the elevation and section drawings so that the judges would be focusing on reading your drawings more. Also, from the elevation, I could clearly see the narrative of your design, two distinctive materials were used on the exterior that symbols a strong meaning to the site, maybe next time add actual materials on instead of just color blocks. Lastly, the overall tone of the board looks well-done, I think you may be to fit all the color tones so you would rather just use simple color codes instead of breaking it and use actual materials in most of your drawings.

Layout

I think that Haley a strong concept in terms of her building design, especially the differentiation between the two materials really show the project well. Concrete material representing the fire operation area, on the other hand, the wooden structure park representing the residential space. Although as Juan pointed out there was not quite of an understanding in the plan, materials tells the narrative, but from what we see in the plan it does not. In this case I think it is very crucial for Haley to strengthen the layout in her plan, since her whole idea was based on the green parks that she wanted to bring to the people. Haley did do a good job by making the V-shape form as a strong axis in the interior that leads the people into following her path. And on the both sides of the main building are the museum and the park. These two completely different construction sort of reflect the confliction of the site. Another thing that Juan mentioned was that the rooms and the programs in the main building should be compacted, due to the fact that there are some rooms too small comparing to a large dining area/kitchen. I do think that the kitchen should be big but not as big as it is now, since the interior plan is desolated by this such area. Therefore, the arrangement of the plan should be fixed immediately, because such arrangement affects how the walls should be located and the walls affect on how the layout of the building. One of the jury also talks about the walls also be used as a special piece of material that cuts into volumes, in this case, volumes could also be seen as programs.

One thing that I realized in Haley’s design, there is a tall high rise block located right in the center of the V-shape building, and it is used as a fire stairs area. At first I thought that this area could be used in a more efficient way since it is the most clear space that people would recognize once they step into the building. So why not make it more interesting. If not, the surrounding area of the “central” could be emphasized more then. Haley should make two axis that goes around the central in this way, there would be two direction being addressed on the side of Quay street and the side of inlet. Once people come in they would be walking around the central of the building.

Site

I like the sustainable strategy that Haley did to her site, but also think it could be done even better. I think that the site could somehow be explored a little more. Due to the fact that there are five clear areas that is manually divided by the wooden path that goes all the way across the inlet, some divergences could be done in these different areas. Total of five separated areas maybe thinking about doing five different vegetation or different strategies in each section. Furthermore, some descendant could be done as the sections go on. I would also suggest that Haley move away the rescue launching dock, which it is now located on the southern of the site. That part of the site seems to be a little crowded. Comparing with other parts of the site, this specific area has too much decoration. The proportion of the design should be balanced since the narrative of this project is about the redemption for the locals.  

State of Worth

Lastly, I think Haley’s project is really concept based. The motivation of how she wanted the payback from the government to revive the society really drive how design into a good shape. Haley challenges her design with a bold geometry which is carried by the force of her idea. And if Haley could continue this such experience throughout her whole site, landscape in this case, her project will be more fascinating. A little more thought need to be dedicated to the “green parks” just as the people were told years ago. Overall, Haley had improved a lot and I believe her project will be deliberately developed in the next couple weeks.

Photo by : Toyota Motor Sales south campus

 

Design Development Statement

The Continuity

The site is located on the edge of Brooklyn Greenpoint, as well as in between historical and industrial inlet. Where my design is based off the idea that every sectional move is related to the ground condition, my plan is one continuous maze-like building divided into three sections that each represents a program. The building is also design in this way to give the neighbors to walk in a direction from the history world of brooklyn to the view of industrial world of New York at the same time the connection points of the design is where the most amazing part would be. You enter from the side of Greenpoint where the residential part is located at as well as the more private area that represent the industrial part of Greenpoint with the material that used for this part. Then encounters the first glass box which is used for connecting the residential program to the apparatus bay; the glass box is used as a greenhouse to transfer the warmth into both sides of app bay and residents. On the other side, you will be coming out from the Museum area that lead you to the open outdoor garden which gives you a great scene of Manhattan. The fire station furthermore explains how the design dealt with post-industrial artifacts, as well as dealing with the sustainability. The design purpose is to communicate with the locals and the current conditions of the site, combining the issues together and create its own narrative.

Photo Credit : CJWHO

Better Way for Urbanization

 

With the visibly growth of population and acceleration of urbanization, people’s need are increased. Architects are devoting on seeking innovative styles and forms for architecture. However, due to the unconsciousness of the importance of humanitarian architecture, and the lack of conservation policy, designers tend to ignore the cultural meaning of the existing buildings and demolish them when a new program is launched. Such actions caused loss on both culture and humanity. To avoid such losses, reinvention should be considered as a main method for urbanization rather than demolition or simply expand the city area and build something new. In this paper, examples will be provided to support this argument.

From many perspective, New York city is one of the most modernized and developed cities on earth. If you ever looked into the urban design of New York, it is easy to tell that all the efficient infrastructures around New York have provided numerous fine connections from district to district. The advised city plan has brought, or still bringing New York better level of economy. However, failure on urban development still happened in this city. There is one example of a project that was abolished later on due the cursoriness to people: the reconstruction did not make to serve people from different social classes, on the contrary, caused people to lose their habitats.  The project is called Bronx expressways which was managed by Robert Moses, the “master builder” of mid-20th century.In this project, Robert Moses accused to his idea of “car culture”. To accelerate the growth of the city, Robert was in favour on building highways instead of subways. To fulfill this task, he planned to demolish a large amount of neighbourhood and supporting facilities, the loss of home causing the residences aggressively antagonistic to the project. The worse thing was that he did not take the conditions of people from different social classes into consideration. Robert Moses neglected that a large amount of citizens could not even afford a car, instead, most of the people actually take subways as their main transportation. his ignorant of people’s habit on transportation caused a huge segregation between the middle and upper class residents to north of Bronx, leaving the rest portion of lower class residents suffering in the south part. Although this project may have benefited the upper class economics, it never worked because of the neglection of the minorities.

In order to avoid such conflicts that could happen in the demolition, some architects decided to deliberately ignore the existing cultural and humanistic elements and establish the “utopian” of their minds. However, culture and humanity are the intelligence and experiences that people gained over time. One can hardly innovate merely by getting rid of them. One famous example is Noisy-le-Grand,  a post-modernism architecture complex which locates in the east suburb of Paris. The complex was designed by Spanish architect Ricardo Bofill during World War II. With the concept of “utopian”, this “city” has the capacity for people from different social classes, it has 610 apartments and looks like a forest of concrete. He expected that his project would become a landmark and would work as the reference for other cities. However, he did not get his wish. The were several failures that happened in this project. Two of the major ones are about the negligence of humanity. First of all, the designer did not seek for any connection between the project and the old city. Bofill focused only on the new form of neighbourhood without paying attention to the needs of residences. Although the buildings are “well done”, the supporting facilities are inadequate. The residences still need to somehow go back to Paris to fulfill their daily needs. Afterall, even though the project is established away from the existing city, it is not as independent as it supposed to be, instead, it made people’s life harder. The other failure is the lack of communication in among people. Instead of having a sense of harmony in the neighbourhood, the large density of apartments makes the space look compressed and stressful, people are “trapped” in the fancy concrete boxes, the public spaces barely work, the whole place is a backwater. Can’t stand with the inconvenience and the lifeless atmosphere of the “city”, most residences moved out. Nowadays, only few elderly who feel rejected by the society still live in this deserted space. The similarity between these people and this neighbourhood shows flashes of tragedy. As Bofill admitted in an interview after the failure:”architecture does not change everything.” Negligence of culture of humanity is the major reason why the “city” waned.

144429349455288700

Photo credit to:Laurent Kronental

On the other hand, there is still some great examples that had successfully incorporated the building into its surrounding atmosphere. Shanghai, as an international modern city, was still determined to maintain its old cultural district. At the same time, they demanded to integrate such districts into the city pace by adding the commercial elements. Tian-Zi-Fang, a famous old neighborhood formed by “Nongtang” (a type of traditional alley in Shanghai), was reinvented successfully. The native residences were all kept, but the first floor was redesigned in to stylistic café and creative groceries. Thousands of visitors are attracted to the area every day, produce the income for maintaining the district. Moreover, the reinvention of the neighbourhood also provides a better life quality for the residence because they were funded to decorate the old house. Such example shows us one possible way to solve the problems that could happen during the city development. For different sites, we can adjust the method, and finally take a humanitarian approach toward the growth of the city. Buildings should be something that people appreciate,  a right way of reinvention can really revive an old city and bring better way of living to people who live there.

userid221496time20130427084741

Photo credit to: http://www.douban.com/group/topic/44986535/

To Sum up, if we can reinvent old buildings, furthermore figure out the way to fit them into modern urban- planning, the charming connection between the “old” and the “new” will be created.  The heritage of the culture will be kept and it enables the later generations tracking the development process of the city. Moreover, by respecting the culture and humanity, people will feel respected by the government and thus supporting the future urbanism. Negligence of culture and humanity will only retard the development of the city.

 

Source:

Helena L. Jubany. “The Social Responsibility of Architects”, Social Responsibility in Practice. June 29, 2011.

Stewart Brand. Emergence, desire lines and predicting behavior, “All buildings are predictions. All predictions are wrong”. How Buildings Learn, 1994, p. 160-178.

Vikas Shah. Thought Economics, The Role of Architecture in Humanity’s Story, June 2012.

Xusheng Zhang.  Four Modes to Change the old neighbor, June 2010.

Chi-Wei Yang, GuiYangLouShi web, Reinvention of old new building:  great examples, April 2014.

Siliang Fu, STLBEACON, Major Chinese cities face urbanization and demolition, June, 2012.

Semiotics 1- Architecture and its Interpretation: A Study of Expressive Systems in Architecture

The main idea to this reading is that the meaning of architecture lies in the interpretations of the individual. Meanings can be formulated from complex things such as cultural backgrounds and religious beliefs to smaller personal ideals such as upbringing and favorite color. These meanings and interpretations vary from person to person and are no longer controlled by the architect or architecture. After the design and construction process, the interpretation is in the individuals hands. But, just because the meaning lies within the individual does not mean that concept and the architects meaning should be disregarded.

Semiotics is a complex system of signals and indexes. Signals are deliberately produced for the purpose of communicating and also so that the interpreter knows that it is used to communicate. Indexes are not used purposefully to communicate an idea. They are preconceived ideas of signals. In addition to signals and indexes there are intentional indexes. They are signals that are not recognized by the interceptor. Pseudo-signals are the interpreters view of a signal, whether is actually is or not. All of these things combined make up the basic of semiotics.

This is important to architecture because at the end of the day, the concept you create as an architect many not be apparent to the people that view your work. The individual has the ability to see what they want within the work. It is still important to have a concept to drive the project through the design process, but it is important to realize that not everyone will see the project as the designer did upon creation. Design should encompass the concept as well as the user and the function of the building. This is something that we should all keep in mind as architects, as the interpretations that we perceive will rarely come true.

If one were to use the Stuckeman Family Building as an example, one thing the architect may have used as a concept is an open floor plan to allow for integration between fields and years as well as leaving everything exposed to be used as learning tools. In addition, one side of the facade is the classical Penn State look using brick and the other is cooper to push the boundaries as architecture often does. A student using the building may interpret part of this building as a view corridor that does not lead to a view that is worthy of such a strong condition. This interpretation could be categorized as an intentional index. Another interpretation that the student might make is that the open spaces are not always conducive to a traditional learning environment.

Overall this reading challenged our ability to analysis architecture writing. But upon further examination, the ideas hidden within this excerpt can apply to our education now as well as to our professional careers. Although this was a difficult reading to understand, we now have a greater understanding on how to interpret an architects concept or meaning of a built from whether intended or not.

Slide show Link: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1WAyi4_QtAIlBchJQYtHD6XRpaJmmSAr4SIC2zjx5Ogc/edit#slide=id.p

Photo Citation: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/255157135113959850/