Creatine and Athletes

Creatine monohydrate is one of the most controversial supplements of today. Many athletes and bodybuilders alike have started using creatine monohydrate as a supplement to their normal diets, with the hopes that it will increase their strength and size. Creatine occurs naturally in the body stored in the kidney and helps supply energy to muscles. It is mainly found in red meats and chicken, but many people take extra creatine as a supplement to get more of it into their bodies. The two major questions about creatine that need answering are: how well does it work? And is it safe to use? For athletes, it seems that the benefits of creatine outweighs the risk and hazard.

A randomized double blind placebo test done at the University of Bloomsburg tested the strength of roughly 30 subjects. The subjects were then given a strength-training program. Half of the subjects were given a standard (5g) dose of creatine monohydrate everyday throughout the trial period. The other half were given a placebo. They found that the group given the creatine had an 8% higher increase in bench press in comparison to the placebo. Also, they found that there was a 14% increase in maximal repetitions at a given percent of one rep maximum bench press in the control group compared to the placebo group.

There are several limitations to this study, including a small sample size, race, age, and gender. Since it is a university study, we can deduct that the subjects were roughly 18-25 years old. This is a good sample age for what I am looking at because serious athletes aren’t typically much older or younger than the subjects. Gender is another limitation because women in general aren’t as strong as men. It would have been interesting to see of their strength gains while on creatine were proportional to the men. Despite the other limitations, the evidence is sufficient enough to say that there is a correlation between creatine ingestion and strength gain. There are also many other studies to contribute to this. A logical mechanism for this is that the increase in creatine increases the energy that is transferred into the muscles, resulting in strength gain and delayed muscle fatigue.

So, if creatine works so well for strength gain, why wouldn’t every athlete use it? As it turns out, creatine is one of the most controversial supplements of today, mainly due to its side effects. pGNC1-2331608dtAccording to webMd, creatine draws water from the rest of your body, so drinking extra water is very important. This will also help to flush out the excess creatine from your body. This shouldn’t be a problem for athletes, as hydration is already an important part of their daily lives.

Although there is concern that creatine can prove harmful to the kidney, liver, and heart, there is currently no significant evidence that supports this. For example, a published study in The Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition failed to reject the null hypothesis that long term creatine supplementation while resistance training impairs kidney function, while consuming a high protein diet.

There have not been a substantial number of reported serious side effects when taking it, so the risk of creatine is not very high. If significant evidence arises that creatine does actually harm the kidneys, liver, or heart, then the hazard would be relatively high. Right now, however, the hazard is low.

For athletes, the strong correlation between creatine and muscle building is far more significant that the risks brought to the table, especially because of how active they are. After looking at this data, it seems that this natural supplement is perfect for athletes, especially in today’s world of sports where everyone is much bigger and stronger.

4 thoughts on “Creatine and Athletes

  1. Colleen Byrne

    While I think this post was very interesting, especially since all of last year my brother constantly bugged my parents to let him try creatine, I also think the sources you cited regarding how the side effects aren’t that bad are not the most reliable. Web MD is notorious for convincing people they have cancer, so that isn’t the most reliable. However, you did a really good job introducing creatine and covering all of the studies on the benefits on creatine on athletes

  2. Philip Littleton

    As someone who uses Creatine before and after workouts, I found your article interesting and relevant to not only myself, but many others who use the substance as a workout supplement. After reading your post, I did some more research to uncover more information about Creatine and this article noted that although there are some signs of pros and cons, there has not been enough research to indicate any harmful or beneficial long term side effects from use of the powder. If you were someone who doesn’t like to take risks, this article on StrongFirst.com suggests eating large doses of protein in order to save money and to get a somewhat similar result from taking in the supplement.

  3. Shannon G Mcclain

    I agree with Daniel about the negative persona creatine has in today’s society. You mentioned the different limitations of the double-blind placebo trial and I’m curious as to whether the researchers will look into the different effects creatine has on women of that equivalent age group. Women tend to have lower amount of testosterone and are naturally weaker, so I wonder if the results will show any variation between genders. The risk of side-effects must not be that high if there has been no evidence about them yet. I agree that this is an example where the benefits outweigh the risk and hazard… at least until proven otherwise.

  4. Daniel Liam Cavanaugh

    This post proved to me that I shouldn’t be accepting the public perception of risk. Because so many people think there are risks involved with creatine, I assumed it was correct and looked at creatine in a negative light. Now I know that there seems to be very little risk involved. Including a study on the risk associated with creatine would have been helpful for me as a reader. You could have chosen an experiment that fails to reject the null hypotheses that creatine does not cause any health problem. That would have backed your statement that no studies have proven any risks to be associated with creatine. I would be interested to see you do your next blog on another supplement, maybe even on steroids. A blog comparing and contrasting regular steroids and deer antler spray would definitely be compelling. Of course, you would have a lot more risk to write about. Here is a source on deer antler spray that you could possibly start with.
    http://search.proquest.com/docview/1525955425?pq-origsite=gscholar

Comments are closed.