Schematic Design Review: Caroline Wilson

Caroline Wilson’s work, Reaching for Sustainability, is dominated by appeals to the civil order of value. As the title suggests, Caroline seeks to incorporate sustainable strategies into every possible element of her building. She has skylights that aid heat gain and shallow green roofs that collect rainwater and naturally cool the apparatus bay. This reduces the need for heating and air conditioning. There are sustainable strategies on top of the firefighters living quarters as well. An angle towards the west on the firefighter’s roof allows for a natural collection of rainwater through gravity. The angle allows for another sustainability device: Caroline states this is the way “to accept the most sunlight using photo-voltaic cells placed on the roof.” Her design focus on sustainable practices through site planning and programmatic decisions reflect her goal of creating a sustainability driven building.

Hierarchical Order of Value

The way Caroline went about her fulfillment of the civic order leaned towards coupling appeal with the industrial order rather than the inspired hierarchical order of value. When focusing on sustainability, two options of execution arise. The designer can lean towards the ethereal expression, in which they might dream of a power producing city, where the buildings continuously make more energy, leaving no carbon footprint. The mode of transportation might be harmless to the environment, and even aid the life and migration of the wildlife cohabiting the space. Or they can lean towards satisfying a desire for efficiency. In Caroline’s approach to satisfying the civic order she shies away from the ethereal and tends towards fulfilling elements of the industrial order. She uses a narrative of sustainable building to highlight efficiency and planned long term payback on investment; payback not being in financial capital but in ethical capital.

In order to highly value the civic order, this firehouse proposal sacrifices in the market and inspired orders. As previously discussed, Caroline focused on appealing to the industrial rather than the inspired order of value in her design of a sustainable building. I would venture to claim that the inspired order and industrial order are mutually exclusive given that the inspired order thrives on dreamlike imagination and the industrial order is rooted in practicality. The test for the industrial order is trial, and trial is not feasible without substance. The inexpressible and ethereal nature of the inspired contradicts the trial nature of the industrial order, therefore, Caroline’s focus on fulfilling the industrial order sacrifices stake in the inspired order. Similarly to the contradiction of the inspired verses the industrial order, Caroline’s focus on sustainability within the civic order dampened her ability to appeal to the market order of value. Sustainably strategies hold value in the civic order because of their demonstration for a just cause, however they skimp on their appeal to a financially driven order. The upfront costs and added infrastructure that make many sustainable strategies possible take away from the building’s short term financial flexibility. They are an investment that may or may not pay off in a strictly fiscal sense. Caroline’s design strategies do a great job of appealing to the civic order of hierarchical values but with her focus on simultaneously satisfying the industrial order, she sacrifices fulfillment of the inspired and market orders of value.

Board + Drawings

Caroline’s drawings utilized color and line weight well. Color choice was appropriate and helpful in reading her drawings. Line weight read without much effort on the audience’s part. She provided a roof plan that mapped out the varying sustainable strategies used on the roof surfaces. This drawing went beyond the schematic design requirements but was crucial in providing a deeper understanding of the project goals. I applaud her initiative and encourage her to develop her building’s roof plan further. She should consider making it a key drawing with obvious time and effort put into it; the roof plan could be a focus of her presentation.

Comments on Reviewer’s Comments

One of her reviewers commented on how well her building read in section and I agree. Plans are needed to see programmatic layout but her one section was ostracized in the bottom right hand corner. I would suggest not treating her sections as an afterthought. Her plans were well done, but her section could be brought up to that level of rigor. In section, the angled opening towards Franklin Street makes sense because it welcomes the public off the street and then subtly funnels them down as program becomes more and more private. The entrance on the east end in contrast to the openings on the west end work well in implying a hierarchy of space. I suggest Caroline develop her longitudinal section further, paying attention to the poché spaces created by her various angles. Also, she might consider creating a series of transverse sections that move through her building from east end to west end. Those sections would help explain the intended hierarchy of spaces and elaborate on the movement through her building.

Using the building to break up territory would increase the strength of Caroline’s proposal. A reviewer remarked, currently her building feels out of touch with the site. I suggest she could rectify this by anchoring her building with her community garden. She might consider using the garden, not as a green polygon, but instead as a pathway in itself that widens and narrows as the land and building meet in new ways. The community garden is a substantial factor in her appeal to the public and to sustainable practices; it could strengthen her concept to heavily focus on integrating her community garden with the layout and circulation of her building. The photo-voltaic cells on the roof of the firefighters living quarters makes sense programmatically. Caroline might consider realigning the angle of the roof to the south in order to capture as much sun as possible. That might entail reorienting the entry way to maintain the hierarchy of spaces created below by the angled roof, however, given the focus of her concept, maximum sustainability should remain the driving force in design decisions.

In Conclusion…

Just as Juan said, “If you’re going to claim sustainability as your concept, you’re going to have to go sustainability crazy. Then we’ll buy it.”

 

Featured image from personal photos – Work by Caroline Wilson

Leave a Reply