Digital Pedagogy Video Guide Presentation

April Millet and I have been asked to present at the Feb 12 Faculty Development series being hosted by the Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence. Chris Gamrat has been working with others to plan these faculty development sessions at various locations around University Park. I the sessions are also being shared and recorded via Zoom.

April and I will be discussing the pedagogical applications of video. We worked together to build an online resource for the University.

INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEO GUIDE: Best practices for creating pedagogically appropriate video – https://instructionalvideoguide.psu.edu/

Progress on the Decision Tool for the Instructional Use of Video website

I have been serving on a sub-committee to develop an online tool that will hopefully help faculty when they’ve made a decision to use video in their courses.

April Millet is the chair, and we’re joined by Ryan Wetzel, Victoria Raish, John Buckwalter, and Peter Warren.

In our last few meetings, we’ve been hammering away at the Formidable Forms plug-in for WordPress. We’re trying to squeeze our required functionality out of the tool and we think we have a solution. I have to give a huge shout out to Ryan who was behind the keyboard and lead a lot of the detailed tinkering of the code.

I spent this morning deconstructing the code again and worked to establish a process. I was successful and even worked on some formatting things that were bugging me. I took everything I learned and blasted out a working draft of the tool on our website.

I’ve documented my work thus far in five screencasts that have been posted to my YouTube channel. I still have more work to capture there, but it’s a good start.

We still have a lot of work to do, but we’ve proven that it can be done and all we need to do is fine-tune our content and delivery and we should be very close to delivery.

Gravity Forms at sites.psu.edu going “bye bye”?

I’ve been working with Ryan Wetzel on building a tool for faculty that will hopefully help them to understand options for using video content for instructional purposes.

We began this project almost a year ago, before CampusPress took over the duty of hosting our Penn State WordPress sites. The transition has been rocky for me as I’ve blogged about in earlier entries.

The newest hiccup is that there are apparently issues with Gravity Forms on this new platform. I’ll share Ryan’s assessment of what he has seen…

For us, Gravity Forms is still working more or less as it is supposed to, however we are getting locked out of forms with no way to unlock them to edit content. Campuspress recommends we clone the form and delete the original whenever this happens then replace the form ID with the new form ID on the page where the form is located. This works for awhile until the form locks us out again.

My staff has been working on duplicating our existing forms in Formidable. It mostly does the same stuff however it formats dates and time in strange ways and allows the user to submit incorrect data (rather than supply a calendar or limiting selections to real HH:MM selections).

It’s hard to say about the conditional logical until we actually spend time building something out with it. However I do believe that Campuspress plans on doing away with Gravity Forms at some point, not sure when, and that Formidable is their forms platform going forward.

I began porting our content over from Gravity Forms into Formidable Forms this morning. Thankfully the process has gone well so far. At worst, this will be additional work because we have to copy and paste all of the content from one form into another. There is not automatic export-import function from what I can tell.

We’ll keep pushing ahead for the time being and hope that all goes well. Do you have any experiences with either Gravity Forms or Formidable? Has your transition to CampusPress gone well?

A tough time for Outreach

I was in a “VP Awards” meeting this morning with Craig Weidemann, the VP for PSU Outreach. I was a little surprised at first that he began the meeting with a question about morale around Outreach in the context of…

I was in a “VP Awards” meeting this morning with Craig Weidemann, the VP for PSU Outreach. I was a little surprised at first that he began the meeting with a question about morale around Outreach in the context of these awards. One of the things I like about working with Craig is that he wanted to hear what everyone in the room had to say about the topic.

We had a pretty frank discussion about the recent organizational-change impacts here at Outreach. We agreed that recognition and awards are important in this time of transition for Outreach. Craig followed-up with an accurate analogy that stressed the importance of tradition and recognition of the things that mean a lot to us in spite of what is a stressful time for many.

Someone was brave enough to share some personal and professional reflections on the effect of a few lay-offs around the organization and a message they had received that it would be a good idea to “seek other employment.” They asked the question to consider the impact of getting an award while you’re standing in the unemployment line.

After some discussion, my response was that “good work is good work” and that recognizing someone is not dependent on whether they were laid-off. Craig added something to the effect that lay-offs are different than firings.

Here in the World Campus, many things haven’t changed since before the RESET. However, I work a lot with others from different units. Some of these units don’t exist anymore. Some don’t have job descriptions yet. It was interesting to note that it appeared that 4 of the 11 of us in the meeting have either been laid-off or have dealt with the impacts of loved ones that were laid off. Since my wife doesn’t work right now, I can’t even gauge the impact of me losing my job.

So when I hear “I’m so busy,” I can’t help but think “be happy to be so ‘busy’ and more importantly what can I be doing to do my best, push my own boundaries, and make life/work better for others?”

Not having taken the Authentic Conversations training yet, I don’t yet understand the connection between us being “authentic” with one another and new changes to our culture (can true cultural change be mandated?), since I never saw that as an operational problem in the committees, cross-functional teams, and in my day-to-day work. If someone had just come by and asked me, I would say that we have other problems, but talking is one of them. People here love to talk. All one has to do, simplistically speaking, is listen, ask questions and take action-planned, collaborative, and timely. But I shouldn’t get ahead of myself before the training.
<!–Saying good bye to colleagues
OHR has helped to place 7 of the 8 PSPB workers that were laid-off
4 of 11 have either been laid-off before or have been effected by it
i am the only one working in my family
craig: difficult balance between living in the numbers and focusing on our great work
awards look good on a resume
people falling through the cracks
are we at square one?
wake-up call this morning–>

LD Research Team Leader’s Meeting

Wenyi – Social MediaLinas – Mobile LearningKent – Games, Sims, and Virtual WorldsCommunication/Collaboration FrameworksNING – awaiting pricing and approval, add Linas and Wenyi; Shannon offered to create groups for us in the “Excellence in Teaching.”Other platforms mentioned: E-Live, Google Docs,…

Wenyi – Social Media
Linas – Mobile Learning
Kent – Games, Sims, and Virtual Worlds

Communication/Collaboration Frameworks
NING – awaiting pricing and approval, add Linas and Wenyi; Shannon offered to create groups for us in the “Excellence in Teaching.”
Other platforms mentioned: E-Live, Google Docs, Zotero, Diigo, MyNetResearch, Wikified
Zotero – Wenyi mentioned it has project management tools

How will our groups handle project management tasks? Zotero possibly (Wenyi), Quickbase a weak possibility.

Linas already spoke about piloting courses. They were considering whether to handle Grad vs. Undergrad courses and surveying the students. First survey to determine student’s needs and second summative survey to assess how well the pilot went.

Opening up the teams
Each leader shared ideas about how they are going to approach opening up the teams. We decided that we need to talk to Rick asap on the topic to get his guidance.

Focus
Linas: mobile utility tools vs. mobile learning objects
Kent: virtual worlds vs. learning-oriented games and simulations
Wenyi: add a third dimension-opportunities for improving the LD process

Games, Simulations, and Virtual Worlds Kick-Off

2010-2011 Research Team Charges.pdfWhat drew you to this particular team? some exposure w/ commercial, entertainment gaming: Atari 2600, Playstation, PS2, PS3, PSP, Nintendo DS, Wii, Macintosh American role-playing, action-adventure, simulation, puzzlersgame design interestsmotivational theory What skills do you feel…

2010-2011 Research Team Charges.pdf

What drew you to this particular team?

  • some exposure w/ commercial, entertainment gaming: Atari 2600, Playstation, PS2, PS3, PSP, Nintendo DS, Wii, Macintosh
  • American role-playing, action-adventure, simulation, puzzlers
  • game design interests
  • motivational theory

What skills do you feel like you are bringing to this project and which ones would you like to work on? (project management related, content related, contacts/networking related, etc.)

  • organizational skills
  • brainstorming – collaborative creation
  • open minded
  • willing to extend myself
  • huge “F” – try to compensate, zealot
  • will need help with short-cuts, meeting deadlines and long-term goals

PSU ETS Team: Google Apps for Education

I just received an invitation to join a ETS team pulled together by Allan Gyorke on Google Apps for Education:Hi Everyone.Google Apps for Education (http://www.google.com/a/edu) is an initiative that provides a suite of communication and collaboration services to educational organizations….

I just received an invitation to join a ETS team pulled together by Allan Gyorke on Google Apps for Education:

Hi Everyone.

Google Apps for Education (http://www.google.com/a/edu) is an initiative that provides a suite of communication and collaboration services to educational organizations.  While many institutions have adopted it as a way to outsource their e-mail services, the suite can do so much more.  All of you have used Google Docs to collaborate with your students and colleagues, but no one at this university fully understands the potential for Google Apps to transform teaching and learning at Penn State.  This is where you come in.

Currently, we are in discussions with Google about licensing, policy, and technical issues.  While those discussions are taking place, John Harwood has asked me to form a team to investigate the pedagogical implications of the services within Google Apps for Education.  This would involve an examination and a write-up of each tool that would concisely describe what it does and how it could be used to enrich teaching and learning.  John would also like to see a plan for informing the university about this new service and getting faculty, staff, and students prepared for its launch.  If and when team has concerns with the suite, those issues should be brought to John’s attention so they can be addressed.  We have contacts at other large universities who have implemented this service, so they can serve as a resource in addition to what the team discovers on its own.

If we do sign an agreement with Google, we should be prepared to implement this service by the beginning of the fall semester.  John would like to have a draft of our research and the training/implementation plan by May 1, 2010 and would like to have monthly updates as the committee does its work.

Please let Jane Houlihan and me know if you are willing to accept this invitation.  Jane will try to schedule the first meeting of this group in the next few weeks and then meet once every two weeks until May.  Not everyone will be able to make every meeting, but that’s fine – I’d like to do most of the work asynchronously using the tools in Google Apps where they make sense.

     Thanks,
      -Allan-

Our first meeting is Fri 12 Feb and I’m really looking forward to it because it’ll be an opportunity to work with a new collection of educators from around the university.

One of my questions will be related to the comment from an SOS member that said that Google’s inability to guarantee which servers would service PSU effectively ruled them out as an option because of security concerns.

UPDATE Fri 12 Feb – Kickoff Meeting

  • Walked into a conversation on how identities will integrate.
  • Documentation will have to be addressed in the documentation
  • GoogleVideo is an institutional framework, only 100 people will be able to upload videos across PSU
  • Look into using Google Contacts to sync/store contacts instead of Apple Address Book
  • there is a test domain that has single sign-on and is stable
  • Roxanne Toto and Kent on Documents – single page front and back written for various groups with scenarios, links, etc.
  • we aren’t creating training materials, just overview docs
  • 4 weeks, 2 weeks check-in, f2f meeting to work through the ideas
  • real-world scenarios
  • we should also capture barriers to implementation
  • how do we establish priority
  • hotseat, Purdue, check it out… voting, etc.
  • Google Moderator – is it included?
  • our tool in isolation vs. integrated with other apps – perhaps an eight question
  • tech side testing – we’re writing papers on “nouns” but should also hit “verbs”
  • our audience are the faculty
  • check out bitly – tinyurl