Instructional Technology Presentation

Brian Daigle and I presented to almost 60 brand new LA’s, TA’s and IST faculty last night. We jointly presented on Canvas and various instructional technologies in two separate presentations. I also gave a presentation on the World Campus Undergraduate Student Population for those in the audience who are new to working with adult learners.

Previously, Amy Garbrick, our director, has been coordinating our office’s participation for these events. I was asked earlier this year to coordinate the IDs supporting this event. There are four of us and we’ve decided to split up and take different semesters. Brian and I covered this FA17 semester with Chris Gamrat providing backup if one of us got sick or was otherwise unable to present. Chris and Ronda Reid will cover the SP18 session and I’ll provide backup. After that it’s Brian and I again, but Ronda will be backup and then Chris and Ronda will present and Brian will provide backup. Then we’ll repeat the pattern.

I had some reflections on the presentation last night that I wanted to make sure I capture for the next time around. These thoughts are not necessarily listed in any particular order.

I will start off with saying that we should use our own devices for a couple of reasons. The first is familiarity. I’m good with Windows 10, but I do not use it every day. Under pressure, these podium machines threw me for a loop a few times. That’s the last thing I want to have to deal with during a presentation. The second reason is that we only have five minutes between sessions and it’s much better to have everything primed and ready to go so that we can do the presentation without wasting valuable time logging in to a new podium computer.

I’d like to see more coordination during the joint presentations if we continue to go that route. I’m not sure we’ll need to next time, but I did want to document this idea. Brian did a fantastic job, but I know we can do better next time as a team if we more clearly workout who’s covering what slides and how the other person can assist. I think we should seriously consider scripting presenter notes for each slide. I’m not suggesting that we read from them or memorize them, but having them in place will inherently lead to a more consistent and smoother presentation. We ask our faculty to do it and I should practice what I preach. Related to the recommendation above about using our own devices, it would be very important that both presenters are absolutely familiar with how all of the resources will be available on the computer being used before any joint presentations. If we decide to do more joint presentations, then I think I’ll recommend that we do a full “dress rehearsal” before the next presentation.

With regards to the presentations themselves, it’s time to have our graphic designers redesign the theme that we’re using. The aspect ratio of the background images are not scaled for 16:9 formats and the typography and other design elements need attention. I would also highly recommend that we move the presentations to Google so that we can collaboratively edit and comment on the work before and after the presentation. It’ll also make it easier to access during and after the presentation by the audience. Some slides are packed with text and we should definitely split that content up to make it more digestible. In general, I think we need to reconsider what we’re covering. There feels like there is too much content or we need to sharpen our focus.

We should consider handouts of the most salient aspects of our presentation. That way the audience has the links and email addresses they need. They can also use it to take additional notes if needed. Lisa mentioned that Amy created a sandbox space where all of the participants were added to that space so that they could actively do things during the presentation. We did create sandbox spaces, but used them for demonstration purposes only. We decided against adding people to our sandbox space partly for logistical reasons, but having gone through that now, I would recommend that we do add participants to the sandboxes and buildout the space to be more robust and follow the flow of the presentations more closely. It could be a mini-course that reflects our content. I think we could use one of the new Canvas Prides for this purpose.

I think we should consider a simple paper-based feedback form that people can fill out in a couple of minutes. It would help us to know what needs they have so that we can keep improving our presentations.

I always try to be as critical and honest with self-assessments as I can be. It doesn’t make sense to do anything else. I have been told that I can be brutal at times, but since this is about my performance, I see no reason to sugar coat things. Having said that, I was very happy to present with Brian. He is an excellent match for our office and last night was just more evidence that he does awesome work here. He was receptive, cool under pressure, and presented very well in front of a new audience.

“A short pencil is better than a long memory!”

Thank you Megan Costello for sharing that with me. It was a quote that her father had shared with her.

When you write it down, you not only have it available as a reference, you also are more likely to remember it in the first place. So you’re able to absorb and act upon the information better than someone who doesn’t take notes.

So when you’re going to meet with someone – in person or on the phone – take notes! (A Short Pencil is Better than a Long Memory, By Bigg Success Staff)

Documentation of my work is an essential part of my workflow. It may not be eloquent, refined, accessible or even intelligible (no really), but I keep meticulous notes – because I have to.

I juggle so many details any given day, that if I did not document them, I would be failing in my responsibilities. If I just coded and adjusted settings all day long, that wouldn’t be as necessary. As a senior instructional designer, I’m often changing my focus from 100,000 feet down to a microscopic level of detail. It’s the rapid and constant shifting that makes it difficult to recall specifics about processes and procedures.

I mostly rely on Evernote and Google Apps for my day-to-day documentation and obviously this blog is a very important place for reflection.

18th Annual Sloan Consortium Conference on Online Learning: Reflections

Notable sessions Ten Strategies to Enhance Collaborative Learning in an Online Course October 10, 2012 – 3:00pm Lead Presenter: David Wicks (Seattle Pacific University, US) Andrew Lumpe (Seattle Pacific University, US) David Denton (Seattle Pacific University, US)Design appropriate projects -…

Notable sessions

October 10, 2012 – 3:00pm
David Wicks (Seattle Pacific University, US)
Andrew Lumpe (Seattle Pacific University, US)
David Denton (Seattle Pacific University, US)

  1. Design appropriate projects – requires collaboration, length of project, complex or challenging, COI
  2. Suitable collaborative tools
  3. Team planning – student picks, consider requirements, homo/heterogeneous?
  4. Collaborative script – http://tinyurl.com/collab-script
  5. Organized into phases – milestones
  6. Individual & group deadlines – everyone has a voice
  7. Provide training for technology
  8. Reflection on the process
  9. Assess individual and group after each phase, lots of feedback
  10. Assess deliverables after each phase

October 11, 2012 – 8:50am
Sebastian Thrun (Udacity, Google, US)

  • mission: education for everyone
  • higher ed in crisis – cost (2x inflation) and debt (next bubble, Penn State #1 borrowing at $160 million last year)
  • knowledge checks embedded in the video
  • Salaman Khan: separate teaching from credentialing
  • 160K classrooms of one
  • $1/student/class
  • adaptive learning – at their own pace, multiple paths, multi-dimensional assessment
  • impact on universities? faculty?

October 12, 2012 – 10:40am
Ray Schroeder (University of Illinois- Springfield, US)
Karen Vignare (MSUglobal, Michigan State University , US)

  • MOOC in three weeks?
  • success due to: internet, cost of tech, Great Recession
  • lots of new LMSs (Google, iTunesU, etc.)
  • University of the People – $500K from Gates foundation to get accredited
  • Factors by scale: other languages, cultures, distributed engagement, assessment (machine graded or peer review), gather data, look at emerging crediting models (badges)
  • MSU looked to Metropolitan Agriculture – new program opportunity, their specialty, international need
  • Open content was a challenge (Creative Commons Attribution license)
  • Used WordPress, Adobe Connect
  • 160 hours in WordPress with another 2 months

October 10, 2012 – 9:00am
Ray Schroeder (University of Illinois – Springfield, US)
Michele Gribbins (University of Illinois – Springfield, US)
  • no PPT! use webtools like Google Sites – worked OK… navigation and flow were awkward… what about a Google Docs Presentation?
  • while not a workshop… there were some interesting discussions

October 10, 2012 – 12:00pm
Amanda Rockinson-Szapkiw (Liberty University, US)

  • no significant difference between eTexts and traditional texts
  • etext users: exhibited different cognitive strategies, aggregated notes, significant impact on how they studied for the course, liked search features, portability, 6 month loan was a negative, some elements weren’t readable, navigation quality varied text to text, want to see more interactivity


Session topics worthy of mention:

  • Rubrics – holistic vs. analytic, involve students in the creation of rubrics, start with observable and measurable outcomes, 4-8 criteria, use even number 2-6 achievement scales, list high to low, use percentages
  • Simulations – Simwriter authoring software, traditional roles (writers, directors, actors, sound/film crews) can be accomplished with fewer people
  • Gaming – check out Lee Sheldon, start with fun, grading was a hassle, instructor buy-in essential, used both cooperative and competitive games

Overall

  • good use of pollanywhere – however give time to respond and reflect
  • twitter applet to gather questions worked well in the sessions I saw it used
  • QR codes everywhere
  • over 34 Penn staters
  • nice location: Disney World
  • schedule of sessions was unwieldy and outdated – should have used sched.org or something similar
  • initially at least, the electronic evaluations were accessible via QR code only
  • ePoster sessions not well organized – improve with table numbers and list locations in the catalog

Instructional Ideas and Technology Tools for Online Success, Week 1

Reflections on Week 1 reading: “We’ll Leave the Light on for You: Keeping Learners Motivated in Online Courses”This article focuses on key strategies motivating student in an online learning environment. Elements of this article tie to discussions that we had…

Reflections on Week 1 reading: “We’ll Leave the Light on for You: Keeping Learners Motivated in Online Courses”

This article focuses on key strategies motivating student in an online learning environment. Elements of this article tie to discussions that we had in our last LD Community meeting. Jeff Swain was emphasizing the importance of being able to articulate our approach as designers. He shared an anecdote about walking away from a painting that he really liked because the artist couldn’t articulate the intentionality of their artwork. It’s a great point. If we cannot share what we hoped to express through our work, then what difference is that then a really lucky monkey pounding away at a keyboard?

How would I hope to express my work to faculty as we being to sit down on a new project? I think that would be a combination of my stated approach, an honest survey of my strengths and weaknesses, and lessons learned. I don’t know if this means developing three different lists or one well crafted statement.

Getting back to this article. I’ve been thinking that one very useful engaging question to start with faculty might be, “how (what are the strategies and techniques you use) do you motivate your students”? I think this kind of question would be very useful for identifying ways that we could structure their content to address engagement, meaningfulness, goals, interaction, feedback, tone, etc.

A reflection on the entire course… it’s difficult to find a path in all this openness. I know that’s kind of the idea, but I get lost in all of the content and areas to explore. It’s negatively motivating to feel like I’m missing a lot of what’s happening.

Accessibility: Triage Web Remediation

Christian gave a great presentation about how the PSU community can triage (turn one huge problem into a queue of smaller, more manageable problems handled through an iterative process) our commitment to the NFB agreement.I’ve posted my initial notes online.I…

Christian gave a great presentation about how the PSU community can triage (turn one huge problem into a queue of smaller, more manageable problems handled through an iterative process) our commitment to the NFB agreement.

I’ve posted my initial notes online.

I had a number of questions, but the big one for us would be: Does triage apply to our course content? We would expect that the “long tail” of any of our given courses would look different from a “normal” website since every page should expect to see significant traffic. How do we even go about gathering data on web traffic? Should we be using Google Analytics?

Object Oriented Programming

A few weeks ago, I started looking into iOS app development again. It’s a professional development exercise to better understand some of the educational tools that are available on this platform. Ravi Patel and I even joked about working on…

A few weeks ago, I started looking into iOS app development again. It’s a professional development exercise to better understand some of the educational tools that are available on this platform. Ravi Patel and I even joked about working on an app together, but nothing is in the works.

I started using Xcode about a year ago and didn’t get to far. I’m currently using Xcode 4.0.1. I can’t upgrade to the newest version without upgrading to Lion. I’m not ready to do that.

This time around, I’m spending more time researching and learning about the core concepts of Object Oriented Programming and that’s been very useful. I’ve used this new body of information to create a growing list best practices and glossary items.

It’ll be a long time before I can create something on my own. I’m still having a difficult time coding with the proper syntax and getting around the basics of the language and the Xcode interface. Things are definitely starting to click however.

I don’t even have an idea of a project to work on, but I’ll start brainstorming useful, fun ideas this spring.

Dr. Sam Richards LDSC10 Presentation

9:15 Keynote Session: Mind Sparking with 720 Dr. Richards joined us to talk about the possibilities of faculty engagement with huge lecture hall classes. I really enjoyed the presentation as it was a compelling example of a faculty member willing…

9:15 Keynote Session: Mind Sparking with 720

Dr. Richards joined us to talk about the possibilities of faculty engagement with huge lecture hall classes. I really enjoyed the presentation as it was a compelling example of a faculty member willing to take risks to reach out to his students.

One of Sam’s suggestions is to sit down and ask faculty, what is interesting to them? What makes them “come alive” about their course? What excites them? His point is that by asking these questions, the possibility of creating deeper levels of engagement with students becomes possible.

He had an interesting point that most of education isn’t interesting… We should always consider how can we add interesting and “edgy” things into our content. We should always think about pushing the envelope: “let the flag touch the ground”-an anecdote from Sam related to his curiosity as a child/adolescent to test traditional mores. (Personally, I do not advocate letting the flag touch the ground as a matter of respect to what it represents.)

Learning happens on the fringes.
Note to self: Never dare or ask Brian to scratch his balls like Sam did in front of the audience.

The final point I wrote down was a great point to video tape faculty to have them look at themselves and assess what they are doing in class. This is a no brainer. I use video to improve my disc golf throws. What is might be difficult is to get faculty to agree to get themselves on tape.

Evolution 2.0 Training

Converting a Course to 2.0So, if I don’t use PACTS, what does this mean to me?What are first confirmations?How do I access PACTS?Which courses are in PACTS and which ones aren’t? How does ISIS compare?What does a permissions error look…

Converting a Course to 2.0

  • So, if I don’t use PACTS, what does this mean to me?
    • What are first confirmations?
    • How do I access PACTS?
    • Which courses are in PACTS and which ones aren’t? How does ISIS compare?
  • What does a permissions error look like from Evo 1.0? How are these errors in/significant for this new system?
  • Can any of my courses go to “Rollover”?

Personalized Learning

Personalized learning requires heavy lifting by the servers as opposed to the faculty adapting the course to each learner.How do you even begin to personalize a learning environment for a kinestetic learner vs. an introspective one? At this point, I…

Personalized learning requires heavy lifting by the servers as opposed to the faculty adapting the course to each learner.

How do you even begin to personalize a learning environment for a kinestetic learner vs. an introspective one? At this point, I think I would need to see successful examples of PLEs used in credit, online, distance education courses.

Article: PLE and Public Education (K-12 context)
Recorded 2011 Webcast: Education Technology: Revolutionizing Personalized Learning and Student Assessment

Tagging: MT4 compared to Blogger.com and ThoughtFarmer

I just made a screencast to show the differences between tagging in MT4, the Blogs@PSU tool, Blogger.com and ThoughtFarmer. All three platforms handle tagging in different ways. Frankly, the Blogger.com tool is my favorite because it allows me to easily…

I just made a screencast to show the differences between tagging in MT4, the Blogs@PSU tool, Blogger.com and ThoughtFarmer. All three platforms handle tagging in different ways. Frankly, the Blogger.com tool is my favorite because it allows me to easily see all of my tags at once and still create new ones very easily.

This screencast was created using my favorite screencasting software, ScreenFlow. This screencast took 2 hr and 21 min to create. I recorded my actions first, edited that footage, recorded a narration, and then edited the audio and video together. I’m still working on how best to create screencasts that are a balance between a well produced piece and something that doesn’t take too long to record.