Dev/Rev Planning

Dev/Rev Planning Process

Dev/Rev = New Course Development and Course Revision Projects

For the past four to five years, I’ve been assisting with developing processes for our College to improve our Dev/Rev Process. While I am an Assistant Director, that title is rather misleading as I am relatively low in the organizational hierarchy of the College. This is relevant because I wouldn’t have been able to make the progress I have to improve things for the designers, which includes myself, and the faculty if I didn’t have the support of my Directors and the Faculty and Administrative leadership of the College. We still have a lot of work to do together but I am happy for the progress we have made.

The presentation above is a distillation of a more detailed process flowchart.

https://app.diagrams.net/ was a huge find as it is a powerful, open-source option for creating diagrams. I really enjoyed working with this software.

Digital Pedagogy Video Guide Presentation

April Millet and I have been asked to present at the Feb 12 Faculty Development series being hosted by the Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence. Chris Gamrat has been working with others to plan these faculty development sessions at various locations around University Park. I the sessions are also being shared and recorded via Zoom.

April and I will be discussing the pedagogical applications of video. We worked together to build an online resource for the University.

INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEO GUIDE: Best practices for creating pedagogically appropriate video – https://instructionalvideoguide.psu.edu/

Instructional Technology Presentation

Brian Daigle and I presented to almost 60 brand new LA’s, TA’s and IST faculty last night. We jointly presented on Canvas and various instructional technologies in two separate presentations. I also gave a presentation on the World Campus Undergraduate Student Population for those in the audience who are new to working with adult learners.

Previously, Amy Garbrick, our director, has been coordinating our office’s participation for these events. I was asked earlier this year to coordinate the IDs supporting this event. There are four of us and we’ve decided to split up and take different semesters. Brian and I covered this FA17 semester with Chris Gamrat providing backup if one of us got sick or was otherwise unable to present. Chris and Ronda Reid will cover the SP18 session and I’ll provide backup. After that it’s Brian and I again, but Ronda will be backup and then Chris and Ronda will present and Brian will provide backup. Then we’ll repeat the pattern.

I had some reflections on the presentation last night that I wanted to make sure I capture for the next time around. These thoughts are not necessarily listed in any particular order.

I will start off with saying that we should use our own devices for a couple of reasons. The first is familiarity. I’m good with Windows 10, but I do not use it every day. Under pressure, these podium machines threw me for a loop a few times. That’s the last thing I want to have to deal with during a presentation. The second reason is that we only have five minutes between sessions and it’s much better to have everything primed and ready to go so that we can do the presentation without wasting valuable time logging in to a new podium computer.

I’d like to see more coordination during the joint presentations if we continue to go that route. I’m not sure we’ll need to next time, but I did want to document this idea. Brian did a fantastic job, but I know we can do better next time as a team if we more clearly workout who’s covering what slides and how the other person can assist. I think we should seriously consider scripting presenter notes for each slide. I’m not suggesting that we read from them or memorize them, but having them in place will inherently lead to a more consistent and smoother presentation. We ask our faculty to do it and I should practice what I preach. Related to the recommendation above about using our own devices, it would be very important that both presenters are absolutely familiar with how all of the resources will be available on the computer being used before any joint presentations. If we decide to do more joint presentations, then I think I’ll recommend that we do a full “dress rehearsal” before the next presentation.

With regards to the presentations themselves, it’s time to have our graphic designers redesign the theme that we’re using. The aspect ratio of the background images are not scaled for 16:9 formats and the typography and other design elements need attention. I would also highly recommend that we move the presentations to Google so that we can collaboratively edit and comment on the work before and after the presentation. It’ll also make it easier to access during and after the presentation by the audience. Some slides are packed with text and we should definitely split that content up to make it more digestible. In general, I think we need to reconsider what we’re covering. There feels like there is too much content or we need to sharpen our focus.

We should consider handouts of the most salient aspects of our presentation. That way the audience has the links and email addresses they need. They can also use it to take additional notes if needed. Lisa mentioned that Amy created a sandbox space where all of the participants were added to that space so that they could actively do things during the presentation. We did create sandbox spaces, but used them for demonstration purposes only. We decided against adding people to our sandbox space partly for logistical reasons, but having gone through that now, I would recommend that we do add participants to the sandboxes and buildout the space to be more robust and follow the flow of the presentations more closely. It could be a mini-course that reflects our content. I think we could use one of the new Canvas Prides for this purpose.

I think we should consider a simple paper-based feedback form that people can fill out in a couple of minutes. It would help us to know what needs they have so that we can keep improving our presentations.

I always try to be as critical and honest with self-assessments as I can be. It doesn’t make sense to do anything else. I have been told that I can be brutal at times, but since this is about my performance, I see no reason to sugar coat things. Having said that, I was very happy to present with Brian. He is an excellent match for our office and last night was just more evidence that he does awesome work here. He was receptive, cool under pressure, and presented very well in front of a new audience.

Learning Design Summer Camp Breakout Session: Nearpod

An interesting take on interactive presentations that appear to be best suited for resident use. There are affordances for online delivery and faculty-learning design office support models. Unfortunately, the feature set really depends upon a paid license.

  • Website or app available
  • Allows for sharing presentations, even if the instructor doesn’t want to control the presentation
  • Lessons can be packaged and self-paced for online use
  • You can give students a code to enter the lesson, it is a way to track participation
  • You can use PowerPoint to build your presentations
  • Keeps metrics on if people drop out
  • Features Polleverywhere-like polling
  • Is there a way to keep notes within Nearpod?
  • There is a free and paid version available – actually there are four levels; Gold is limited to 50 students, Institutional levels allow for large 100+ students
  • There is a collaboration board feature as well – other features: quiz, draw it, FITB, memory test
  • How would we support Nearpods in our WC Online Delivery Course format; Cheryl doesn’t know, it’s not clear if a designer can create a Nearpod and share it with an instructor for use in their live course section

Wrong Description for my InstructureCon 2017 Presentation!

I’ve sent one of the organizers an urgent message to fix the inaccurate information and to change it to…

Kent Matsueda, Assistant Director of Design, College of Information Sciences and Technology, Penn State University

This after-action report will provide a briefing of a declassified mission and how it succeeded through the use of a clever peer evaluation tool developed at Penn State University. This LTI tool provides covert team leaders with valuable feedback that can be used to improve the effectiveness of field agents on future missions. There will also be a call to other designers and developers to join our R&D Lab to build a better tool for future use in our agencies and institutions.

Having said that… Vice President is a nice promotion. I wonder when my Dean will get that update 🙂

ANGEL: Certificate-Generating Tool Instructions

I met with a group of IDs and IPSs from Outreach to present on some work that I did while working on a solution for the PSU School of Nursing.

I have documented my overview, procedures, and implementation notes in an Evernote: “ANGEL: Certificate-Generating Tool Instructions“.

This project covers the design, development and implementation of a solution that was developed to automatically generate certificates-of-completion for participants taking online continuing education credits. Nurses in PA need to maintain professional development credits in an ongoing basis. PSU Outreach worked with the School of Nursing to develop self-paced online learning that would satisfy this need.

Accessibility: Triage Web Remediation

Christian gave a great presentation about how the PSU community can triage (turn one huge problem into a queue of smaller, more manageable problems handled through an iterative process) our commitment to the NFB agreement.I’ve posted my initial notes online.I…

Christian gave a great presentation about how the PSU community can triage (turn one huge problem into a queue of smaller, more manageable problems handled through an iterative process) our commitment to the NFB agreement.

I’ve posted my initial notes online.

I had a number of questions, but the big one for us would be: Does triage apply to our course content? We would expect that the “long tail” of any of our given courses would look different from a “normal” website since every page should expect to see significant traffic. How do we even go about gathering data on web traffic? Should we be using Google Analytics?

NMC Webinar Presentations

http://catalyst.navigator.nmc.org/gallery/Future of Learning EnvironmentsJosephine Hofmann & Anna HobergWorkplace learning changing requirementslearning has to be a part of daily work (not rigid training)just-in-time learningLearning 2.0 – learning w/in working process, requires more from learners and from learning designFocus for Design GridManagement…

http://catalyst.navigator.nmc.org/gallery/

Future of Learning Environments
Josephine Hofmann & Anna Hoberg

  • Workplace learning changing requirements
    • learning has to be a part of daily work (not rigid training)
    • just-in-time learning
  • Learning 2.0 – learning w/in working process, requires more from learners and from learning design
    Capture.PNG
  • Focus for Design Grid
    Capture2.PNG
  • Management Audit Framework – looking at multiple aspects of a company before designing learning, conducts interviews, the create a complex graphic to summarize their findings
    learning environment audit.PNG
  • Learning 2.0 wrap-up: “assure future innovation, offers approaches for the demographic change, prepare employees for a dynamic, permanent changing environment”
  • big challenge: cultural change

Hands-on Info Tech Virtual Lab Powered by Cloud Computing
Peng Li, East Carolina University

  • HP catalyst project team
  • large DE student population (about 100 students)
  • abstract: secure, scalable, remote lab learning environment allows for learning anytime and anywhere
  • installed HP servers, virtual labs, application image library
    virtual labs cloud computing diagram.PNG
  • physical labs are too difficult to maintain
  • 1 server can replace multiple hardware computers
  • decentralized – students install their own, need powerful computers and instructors cannot monitor work/provide help
  • centralized approach – using multiple cloud systems, on-demand, highly scalable
    virtual lab project status.PNG
  • visualization is not simulation (SL = virtual world simulator), real IT applications
  • reservation system on Blade Server
  • setting up and maintaining a cloud computing system is not easy
  • assessment: most like virtual labs, helped to understand topics, develop hands-on skills, easy to monitor, easy to seek help, collect resource data
  • spread due dates… reduces load, use in evening
  • high speed internet and firefox required
  • space and memory is required to support more students

Computation Chemistry Infrastructure
Isaac K’Owino

  • audio problems – great opening video
  • virtual chemistry tools VLab 1.6.4 and ChemLab 2.0
  • http://www.modelscience.com/products.html?ref=home&link=chemlab
  • grad, undergrad, and HS students work together
  • encourages hands-on experience
  • students don’t need real labs if they have these virtual labs to learn
  • awesome collaboration and opportunities to make huge impacts
  • http://irydium.chem.cmu.edu/find.php

Reflections
I logged on today to specifically tune into the presentation on virtual labs powered by cloud computing. It was a very interesting presentation and I wonder if there are aspects of this project that we could benefit from here at IST or elsewhere around PSU. We’re already using virtual labs at IST, but I’ve heard that scalability is an issue and concerns that we’re starting to use demonstrations over visualization.

The project that really grabbed my attention was the last presentation from Isaac in Kenya. Although there were audio problems to begin with, I was impressed with the work Isaac has been doing with collaboration from around the world and the awesome impact they appear to be having with HS, undergrad and graduate-level students.

NMC Learning Analytics Online Workshop Reflections

Event Listing http://www.nmc.org/events/learning-analytics-webinarOn iTunesU http://itunes.apple.com/itunes-u/nmc-horizon-connect-learning/id489707147NERLA – NorthEast Regional Learning AnalyticsDavid Wedaman, from Brandeis, and others are working on creating a Learning Analytics Center that will open resources for schools. I wonder if IST and Shelby Thayer with Outreach would be…

Event Listing http://www.nmc.org/events/learning-analytics-webinar
On iTunesU http://itunes.apple.com/itunes-u/nmc-horizon-connect-learning/id489707147

NERLA – NorthEast Regional Learning Analytics
David Wedaman, from Brandeis, and others are working on creating a Learning Analytics Center that will open resources for schools. I wonder if IST and Shelby Thayer with Outreach would be interested in this.

Tom Haymes, Houston Community College – Lessons learned and take-aways

  • Garbage-in > Garbage Out led to “what is learning and how do we want to measure it?” discussion
  • You gotta start “right” in order to get something useful out of the project
  • Measure skills rather than knowledge
  • Gamification tie-in [Tom mentioned someone, but I missed the name, will ask for the contact]
  • Technology won’t be expensive, the planning and analysis will be
  • His project is going to be open source via Gates Grant!
  • The Three-E Strategy for Overcoming Resistance to Technological Change http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/TheThreeEStrategyforOvercoming/163448

Amber Stubbs – An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics

  • Computational linguistics, analyzing text
  • She has a book coming up in 2012
  • Corpus is a collection of natural language data – used for plagiarism detection, speech detection, machine translation
  • Toolkits – NLTK and MALLET and Weka
  • Unsupervised tasks – pour in the data and see what comes out (plagiarism detection)
  • Supervised tasks – annotate the data to get more accurate output; use training data (example: document classification)

Resources
http://www.educause.edu/blog/pkurkowski/ELIReleasesNewBriefonLearningA/229163
NMC Horizon Report > 2012 Higher Ed Edition http://www.nmc.org/publications/horizon-report-2012-higher-ed-edition
2012 NMC Horizon Project Short List http://www.nmc.org/publications/horizon-report-2012-higher-ed-edition

Reflection
PSU World Campus is currently considering the Pearson LMS. How does Pearson measure success? Because that drives the analytics behind student papers to high rates of graduation. I wonder how Pearson has communicated what their approach is. Would their decisions be the same that we would agree on? How could we know without a clear discussion internally and then with Pearson?

MTSS Media Tech Expo

Just came back with Brian from the Tech Expo at the HUB. There were about 20-25 vendors showing their high tech array of resources and services.I spent time talking with four vendors, two of them with Brian. The ones Brian…

Just came back with Brian from the Tech Expo at the HUB. There were about 20-25 vendors showing their high tech array of resources and services.

I spent time talking with four vendors, two of them with Brian. The ones Brian and I saw were about video production and AMX-brand media controllers. I don’t remember the company that was showing off their integrated, network-oriented, production-class video capturing, transcoding, editing, streaming and publishing system. As you can imagine from the description, it was pretty freaking cool. The salient point I took away was that they were working on a system that was sensitive to:

  • multiple editing platforms under one roof
  • rapid digital video downloading from direct-capture video hard drives
  • flexible, end-user-selectable, exporting and publishing
  • simultaneous, network-based project workflow

The second vendor was AMX and Brian could really talk more about that visit. The one cool thing I took from there was that they have recognized the potential impact of the iPad and are developing an app that would allow you to control their switcher as an alternative to their pricey, proprietary controllers!

The place I spent most of my time was with AVRover.com, a vendor that has exclusive distributing rights over the OnFinity interactive whiteboard system. It takes the concept of a SMART Board to a new level. Being wand-based, one can now interact with projected content that is up to 12.5 feet! The hardware-software solution works with any app and was very responsive. It wasn’t cheap though: $863 and $2900 if you buy it integrated with a very well thought out portable projector, speaker system, full input and output panels and a secure shell that brought the system weight to 17 lb that fits in an included roller suitcase.

AVRover_Puppy.jpgGiven the price, the next vendor had a very interesting alternative: a wireless tablet. Simple and easy to use. I think they come in at under $300. The problem is, not every one is comfortable working with a tablet.

All-in-all a very interesting expo and worth the hour and a half we had to spend walking around. Now, we’ll have to cross our fingers about winning the door prizes 🙂